I've just finished “The Outsider” and very much impressed by it. But in the end I was undecided if the protagonist was autistic or sociopathic. To a degree the character was intellectually aware of his emotional dis-junction from society, which suggests a sociopath, but he seemed unaware of the seriousness of his crime, which suggests he is autistic. I couldn't decide given that I don't know what the attitude towards Africans was in Algeria during the 50's – is a callousness towards Africans the norm in his society? I am hoping Salio might be able to comment on this.
Anyway, after reading the novel I read the foreword and in that an interview with Camus describes how the protagonist was making an intellectual and philosophical decision to reject social norms. So he is not autistic – he is a martyr to a philosophy that rejects social norms. He chooses to die for a belief that he shouldn't need to conform to a social norm.
Fine, that's a point a view, but as the author, does he get to explain what he meant to say? If he were a critic, I wouldn't agree with his reading. I don't think that is what is described, but do I have to give his opinion more weight because that is what he intended?
Anyway, after reading the novel I read the foreword and in that an interview with Camus describes how the protagonist was making an intellectual and philosophical decision to reject social norms. So he is not autistic – he is a martyr to a philosophy that rejects social norms. He chooses to die for a belief that he shouldn't need to conform to a social norm.
Fine, that's a point a view, but as the author, does he get to explain what he meant to say? If he were a critic, I wouldn't agree with his reading. I don't think that is what is described, but do I have to give his opinion more weight because that is what he intended?