• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

Gary Glitter in trouble in Vietnam

Miss Shelf

New Member
Police Search for Gary Glitter in Vietnam
Thursday, November 17, 2005 7:45 AM EST
The Associated Press


HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — Authorities said Thursday they are searching for former British rock star Gary Glitter over his alleged relationship with a Vietnamese teenager.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Le Dung said officials have confirmed that Glitter, 61, whose real name is Paul Francis Gadd, was residing in a home in southern Vung Tau city and had applied for permanent resident status in Vietnam.

Glitter rose to fame with glam-rock songs in the 1970s, most notably his only U.S. hit, "Rock and Roll Part 2," a largely instrumental song that has been a staple at stadium sporting events for years. Among his other songs hits were "I'm the Leader of the Gang (I Am)" and "Do You Wanna Touch."

Glitter fell from grace in 1999 when he was convicted in Britain of possessing child pornography. He served half of a four-month jail sentence before being released. He later went to Cambodia and was permanently expelled in 2002, though Cambodian officials did not specify his crime or file charges.

Dung said that Glitter had left the house on Nov. 12, and police are seeking his whereabouts.

"At present, relevant authorities Ba Ria Vung Tau province are trying to trace this gentleman, and clarify the relationship between this gentleman and a Vietnamese juvenile," he said.

Dung said authorities have conducted interviews with a 15-year-old girl who they found in the home rented by Glitter.

"If evidence of a (legal) violation is found against Mr. Paul Francis, and especially evidence of sexual child abuse, I believe that very strict legal measures will apply to him," he said.

In Vietnam, the crime of sexually abusing a child can lead to the death penalty.
(I put that last sentence in boldface)

Right on, Vietnam!

I wondered whatever happened to Gary Glitter, now I know.
 
No issue here. In DK 15 is the age of consent. So morally I've no problems with that. Legally: he's an idiot to break the laws of the country where he's staying, that's just asking for trouble.
 
She was 15 when they found her, but how long had she been there? If he's been there since 2002 she could have been 12, 13, or 14 and having a relationship with him too...
 
Does this mean he could wind up in a Vietnamese prison? Ask any Vietnam War vet if that would be a fun place to be.. I think they should lock him up and throw the key into the nearest swamp.
 
Jemima Aslana said:
No issue here. In DK 15 is the age of consent. So morally I've no problems with that. Legally: he's an idiot to break the laws of the country where he's staying, that's just asking for trouble.
No moral problem with a 61 year old and a 15 year old girl? :eek: I think that it's the most disgusting thing I've heard in a long time. How fitting that I'm reading Lolita at the moment, though :D
 
The Vietnamese government should throw this old booger in prison and arrange to have the dads of teenage girls be his guards..
 
abecedarian said:
The Vietnamese government should throw this old booger in prison and arrange to have the dads of teenage girls be his guards..

I've heard that people like him are not very well liked in the prison community...:D
 
No real comment on the issue. He's yet to defend himself on the charges so I don't think it's fair to comment. She may well have misled him into thinking she was older, in which case it's a completely different issue.

I just wanted to say that Miss Shelf's thread heading made me guffaw out loud, though!! :D :D
 
MonkeyCatcher said:
No moral problem with a 61 year old and a 15 year old girl? :eek: I think that it's the most disgusting thing I've heard in a long time. How fitting that I'm reading Lolita at the moment, though :D
I'd look again if I saw them together on the street, mind you. I'd also be wondering what the heck she sees in that dude. But as such I see nothing wrong.

However, as Moto points out: if she's been there since before she turned 15 I'd have a problem with it. And even though she's 15 I'd of course also have a problem if she's not there of her own free will, but then we're speaking of something entirely different.

As such Mr. Glitter should have taken heed the laws of the country. He dug his own grave there, so I've no problem with whatever punishment they might mete out for him. He got himself in trouble, but the issue that just so happens to be illegal there isn't an issue in and of itself as I see it.
 
Well, well, well. What a surprise - Glitter's now been arrested. If guilty, he could face a firing squad.
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
Never heard of the guy, but I sincerely hope the worst for him. If not death, then perhaps he'll be some guy's "little girl" in prison.:D
 
SFG75 said:
Never heard of the guy, but I sincerely hope the worst for him. If not death, then perhaps he'll be some guy's "little girl" in prison.:D

Well, I'm not sure that he was all that big anywhere else but in the UK, so that's not surprising.

However, your suggestion has gone down well over here in the UK with some friends I have around right now!:D:D:D
 
Well, I've no fondness for Glitter/Gadd but I'll be old-fashioned and presume innocence until proved guilty, so I've nothing to say on these allegations.

In relation to his earlier conviction in the UK (for possessing pornographic images of children on his computer), only one thing ever made me feel any sympathy for him, which was when he came out to talk to the press after he was released from prison and said how ashamed and remorseful he was, wanted to rebuild his life etc. Some of the tabloid photographers asked him to do a double-thumbs-up for a photograph, which he wisely refused, as they pnly wanted him to do this so that they could print the photo the next day with a caption along the lines of "Pop Pervert Unrepentant."
 
Jemima Aslana said:
No issue here. In DK 15 is the age of consent. So morally I've no problems with that. Legally: he's an idiot to break the laws of the country where he's staying, that's just asking for trouble.

It may be the law here in Denmark, but I do find it to be very very wrong.

A 15 year old is not matured emotionally. No way can anyone convice me that he is not putting some kind of pressure on her or controll her in some ways.
A 15 year old should be with someone at the same age, if they should be together sexually.

Flower
 
Shade said:
Well, I've no fondness for Glitter/Gadd but I'll be old-fashioned and presume innocence until proved guilty, so I've nothing to say on these allegations.

In relation to his earlier conviction in the UK (for possessing pornographic images of children on his computer), only one thing ever made me feel any sympathy for him, which was when he came out to talk to the press after he was released from prison and said how ashamed and remorseful he was, wanted to rebuild his life etc. Some of the tabloid photographers asked him to do a double-thumbs-up for a photograph, which he wisely refused, as they pnly wanted him to do this so that they could print the photo the next day with a caption along the lines of "Pop Pervert Unrepentant."

No smoke without fire. As they say. And of course he's going to be remorseful after BEING CAUGHT. Has to think of his career, after all. I have no sympathy at all. I don't care how legal - or near-legal - it is. It's just not right.
 
Well, on the news yesterday, it said he was accused of having sex with two girls aged twelve.

There is no cure for his addiction. nor for any pedophile's addiction. Yet they keep being released.

The firing squad's too kind. Much better to castrate him and keep him in prison as a sex toy. Mind you, who the hell would get a stify looking at him?
 
CDA said:
No smoke without fire. As they say. And of course he's going to be remorseful after BEING CAUGHT. Has to think of his career, after all. I have no sympathy at all. I don't care how legal - or near-legal - it is. It's just not right.

Truer comments have never been spoken. Amen!, in regards to the being caught part. It's one thing to be sorrrowful-it's another thing to be so for the right reason.
 
Back
Top