Miss Shelf
New Member
This case http://www.wcpo.com/news/2005/local/12/01/jury.html has me wondering: is being a caregiver a valid excuse to get out of jury duty? What happened back in the day (let's say the '50s and '60s) when housewives got called for jury duty? I think there were more trustworthy neighbors who'd look after the kids back then. Is it really that difficult these days to find someone to care for the kids temporarily? There was no guarantee the dad would have been picked to sit on a jury. What would the parents have done if, let's say, dad had to be hospitalized for a few days? I don't know how much of a hardship it was for the grandparents to watch the kids while dad appeared in court. I'm wondering:
1) Has our society become so alienated that people don't bother to form any social attachments outside the family? Is it irresponsible of parents not to plan for unexpected difficulties like this?
2) Has jury duty really become something to avoid by any means possible? If this keeps up, and "working", "caregiving", "I'm sick", etc. are excuses to get out of jury duty, who's left to fill the jury box? I don't think most people are eager to serve on a jury, but it's a civic duty, one that we as Americans should be proud to be allowed to serve. We can go around and around on the flaws in the American judicial system, but our right to a trial by a jury of our peers is one that is precious, and everyone should remember that wars were fought to preserve that right, among others.
In my opinion, it would be poetic justice if that father were ever to stand trial for something and have his trial delayed because there were not enough jurors in the pool.
What do you think?
1) Has our society become so alienated that people don't bother to form any social attachments outside the family? Is it irresponsible of parents not to plan for unexpected difficulties like this?
2) Has jury duty really become something to avoid by any means possible? If this keeps up, and "working", "caregiving", "I'm sick", etc. are excuses to get out of jury duty, who's left to fill the jury box? I don't think most people are eager to serve on a jury, but it's a civic duty, one that we as Americans should be proud to be allowed to serve. We can go around and around on the flaws in the American judicial system, but our right to a trial by a jury of our peers is one that is precious, and everyone should remember that wars were fought to preserve that right, among others.
In my opinion, it would be poetic justice if that father were ever to stand trial for something and have his trial delayed because there were not enough jurors in the pool.
What do you think?