• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

T. Coraghessan Boyle: The Tortilla Curtain

novella

Active Member
I'm almost halfway through this novel. TCB is really my kind of writer. He doesn't waste words. Every page is packed with good character development and potent, relevant description. Also, he's managed to maintain a good degree of tension so far, and it's hard to guess where the story is going.

Basically it juxtaposes some well-off gringos who live in the canyons behind Santa Monica, CA, with an illegal Mexican couple who are living rough and are desperate for work.

Someone mentioned on this site somewhere that they got bored with this book, that it had too much description or something. Can't say I agree. I'm finding it very dense but fun. TCB has a very good eye for the telling detail, though I guess the stereotypes that he's relying on are a little tired.

Well, I'll report back when I'm done.

Has anyone else read this?
 
Only slightly on-topic - I've read T. C. Boyle's collection of shorts, aptly named Stories, which contains 68 shorts written by mr. Boyle. Despite my avid love for short stories, I just couldn't battle my way through this. Admittedly, he writing-style is simply gorgeous, but .. well .. nothing happens. At all. Ever.

Guess that's the price I pay for being of the MTV-generation.

Cheers
 
I haven't read this, but it sounds really good. I doubt my shop will have it, but I will have to ask them to order it for me.
 
I've had two classes in which the short story "Greasy Lake" was used. That was the only exposure I had to Boyle before a friend suggested I read The Tortilla Curtain. I was loathe to read it at first since it reminded me of a particular class taught by a not-so-great-and-entirely-boring professor. Thankfully, I gave it a try and was pleasantly surprised.
 
Okay, I've finished this novel. Pleasantly surprised that, although Boyle pretty much stuck to his stereotypes as we know them, he was able to pull of an ending that worked. The denouement has a sort of Magic Realism poetic justice that sheds a different light on the rest of the book. Without spoiling, let me just say that the way the reader views fate and destiny and luck are shifted by the outcome.

The writing was consistent throughout, with a few predictable plot twists, but nicely sustained characters. The main guy, Delaney Mossbacher, wasn't as well drawn as I would have liked, almost as if Boyle was afraid to put too much of the personal into him and so he has the quality of an empty vessel sometimes, with some pat ideas and cause-effect behavior, but his introspective moments are not idiosyncratic enought to be really believable.

Overall, the book is as good as any recent reads by Boyle. He's an economical and expressive writer.
 
OK. So, I've finally started reading this book and I just can't get into it. I've been reading it for DAYS now and I'm less than halfway through it. I find anything to do rather than read, which isn't common for me.

I think my problem is that I can't identify with any of the characters. In fact, I want to knock Delaney on his and tell him to stop being such a whiney pushover!

Please let it get better.
 
You're so right, mehastings. There are really no sympathetic appealing characters in the book. Maybe it won't be for you. I was sustained by the situation in the canyon and wanting to know when, if ever, the two sets of main characters would interact and what would happen then. I agree, though. Both Delaney and his wife are really venal, blind people.
 
Now this is interesting novella (well, it's kind of interesting) - whereas you hated Bonfire of the Vanities and liked this, I felt inversely. Well, didn't hate it, but it was three stars rather than five, so to speak. I only compare the two because so many reviews on the back of my copy did. Here's how I reviewed it for another board:

T.C. Boyle is the American writer formerly known as T. Coraghessan Boyle. (Well: someone must have had a word with him about that. According to his website, it was his British publisher, who felt that Coraghessan was such a forcefully Irish name that it might alienate his British readers. As a semi-Irishman it didn't even occur to me that Coraghessan was an Irish name, just that it was unpronounceable and clumsy, and how bad must the "T." be if he choose Coraghessan over it?)

He's one of those writers who has accumulated a hefty body of work - nine novels and five collections of stories - without ever really making it above the radar of publicity. I think the only time I had heard of him outside bookshops was when Anthony Hopkins starred in the film version of his fifth novel, The Road to Wellville, the story of John Harvey Kellogg, cornflake-inventor and nineteenth-century alternative health quack. Anyway Bloomsbury, his nervous British publisher, have otherwise kept faith with him and they were right about the name thing, as I finally bought The Tortilla Curtain recently with its jazzy new jacket and abbreviated author. (The type hasn't been reset though, so the reader is still left guessin' how you say Coraghessan on every verso page of the book.)

I thought to begin with that The Tortilla Curtain might be one of the worst titular puns of all time - up there with Middlesex - as a Tex-Mex play on Torn Curtain. But I'm not sure it is: the characters in the book refer unironically to "the tortilla curtain" as the nebulous border between Mexico and California where illegal immigrants swarm over to seek work and a better life. And this is what the book is about: the crossed lives of a Mexican immigrant and his wife (Cándido and the ironically named América), and a well-to-do Californian writer and his wife (Delaney and Kyra). The latter lives in an enclosed settlement, where the neighbourhood management group are always trying to get greater and better security systems installed, to prevent the Mexicans from breaking into their sanctuary. These are exchanges which could easily be heard about aslyum seekers and economic migrants in Britain today:

"This society isn't what it was - and it won't be until we get control the borders."

"That's racist, Jack, and you know it."

"Not in the least - it's a question of national sovereignty. Did you know that the U.S. accepted more immigrants last year than all the other countries of the world combined - and that half of them settled in California? And that's legal immigrants, people with skills, money, education. The ones coming through the Tortilla Curtain down here, those are the ones that are killing us."

And Boyle clearly wants to tug our heartstrings when he switches in alternate chapters to Cándido and América, as they struggle to find work illegally, simply because there is nothing for them back home. And when the neighbourhood manages to get the local 'labour exchange' cleared - the place where immigrants gather every day hoping for a few hours' black-market work doing menial labour - they are thrown onto the scrapheap, reduced to scavenging from KFC bins and stewing cats, although never - perhaps he doesn't want to risk our sympathy too much - to crime or prostitution.

The difficulty is that he overdoes it, and eventually I reached a sort of tipping point, where put-upon and shat-upon Cándido and América started a forest fire, and I found it hard not to view them from then on as accident-prone unintentional comic relief, a Laurel and Hardy pair, which weakened the whole moral thrust of the book terribly - the moral seeming to be that the measure of a society is how it treats its weakest members, and if you start hurting them then you reap what you sow. It escalates from there, and tragedy is heaped upon tragedy, and more tragedy, and then more.

I got through The Tortilla Curtain pretty quickly, as I did with the book many of the cover quotes have compared it to: Tom Wolfe's The Bonfire of the Vanities. (Probably this comparison arises because both turn on a white-on-black (or -coloured) car accident, and pursue the disparate lives of their respective races.) And despite being described on the cover as having "zing" and "exuberance" - things Wolfe's book has in spades; it sings with zing - I didn't spot any of this in Boyle's book at all, nor of the comic invention it was also feted for. Nor were there any of Wolfe's Dickensian characters. It was well structured and carefully plotted and had its big heart in absolutely the right place; but for me, although The Tortilla Curtain is precisely half the book that Bonfire is in terms of page length (355 against 710, fact fans), in every other way it doesn't get anywhere near that far.
 
Hope you don't mind, Shade, if I comment a bit on your review.

I think your point of view here is very English. For one thing, Boyle is hugely popular and well known in the US, and is particularly known as a great reader, drawing healthy crowds to his readings. I've been reading him since World's End, his first and, I think, best novel, written back in the 80s. Perhaps he is not on the radar in the UK, just as someone like Sebastian Faulks is neither known nor particularly enjoyed in the US. (I think Faulks is melodramatic crap, but that's another post.)

I think Tortilla Curtain is actually a very unsubtle reference to Iron Curtain, not the movie Torn Curtain. I took it as an accepted S. Cal. regional expression.

Where you see Boyle reaching a 'tipping point' in his portrayal of the illegals, I felt that he was straying into a kind of SoCal magic realism, where those characters began to take on a kind of immortality and resilience that Delaney and Kyra lacked. I didn't read them as comic at all.

Your review indicates that you've read it more as a social treatise, whereas I read it more as an allegory. I enjoyed the lack of self-knowledge of the American couple contrasted with the painfully self-aware Mexicans, who each in their own minds agonize over their bad choices and the obstacles they're facing. Delaney, meanwhile, is completely wrapped up in his ideas about how much he should engage with the brutality of wild things. Maintaining the 'false' world inside the gates is an obsession that stands in counterpoint to his 'nature ramblings', which are really nothing more than his own misunderstandings about what's really going on 'out there': women being raped in the canyon, people living in old cars, local kids trashing people's belongings. The brutality of the wild things out there has little to do with coyotes.

Perhaps this is all too obvious. But I felt that these characters represented more than stereotypes, which made it a bigger book for me. Though it would never occur to me to compare it with Bonfire. I just don't get that. Maybe that comparison was made for just the UK market. I think of Wolfe's characters as almost blow-up dolls that he manipulates through a bunch of plot devices. They have virtually no inner lives, just materialistic and social goals. Boyles characters inhabit themselves, even though they may be equally shallow sometimes.
 
Thanks for that novella, and for the background on Boyle. Several books on from Tortilla Curtain, he remains mostly an unknown quantity in the UK, despite being published by the same people as Harry Potter... Your comments made me think I should maybe revisit the book - and then I remembered I'd given it to the local charity shop in a recent clearout!

Maybe I'll try World's End instead.
 
Back
Top