• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

Vladimir Nabokov: Invitation to a Beheading

Libra

Active Member
Nabokov does not disappoint.Once again,intense,powerful and dark humor.



From Wiki:


"The novel takes place in a prison and relates the final twenty days of Cincinnatus C., a citizen of a fictitious country, who is imprisoned and sentenced to death for "gnostical turpitude." Unable to blend in and become part of the world around him, Cincinnatus is described as having a "certain peculiarity" that makes him "impervious to the rays of others, and therefore produced when off his guard a bizarre impression, as of a lone dark obstacle in this world of souls transparent to one another."[5] Although he tries to hide his condition and "feign translucence," people are uncomfortable with his existence, and feel there is something wrong with him. In this way, Cincinnatus fails to become part of his society.

"While confined, Cincinnatus is not told when his execution will occur. This troubles him, as he wants to express himself through writing "in defiance of all the world's muteness," but feels unable to do so without knowledge of how long he has to complete this task.[6] Indifferent to the absurdity and vulgarity around him, Cincinnatus strives to find his true self in his writing, where he creates an ideal world. Taken to be executed, he refuses to believe in either death or his executioners, and as the ax falls the false existence dissolves around him as he joins the spirits of his fellow visionaries in "reality."

Other characters include Rodion the jailer, the director of the jail Rodrig, and Cincinnatus' lawyer Roman. Some suggest that these names are meant to mimic that of the protagonist of Fyodor Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment, Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov. Cincinnatus' wife Marthe, a child named Emmie, and fellow prisoner "M'sieur Pierre" are also secondary characters"



:star5:
 
I'm sure this is a good book, but it seems like a waste of time for people that have read The Trial already. Can anyone tell me if i'm right/wrong/somewhere inbetween?
 
I'm sure this is a good book, but it seems like a waste of time for people that have read The Trial already. Can anyone tell me if i'm right/wrong/somewhere inbetween?


Yes,I can tell you,you are wrong..:D

I don't understand.What Trial? Nabokov a waste of time? not for me.
 
Yes,I can tell you,you are wrong..:D

I don't understand.What Trial?
It sounds a lot like The Trial by Kafka to me. Nabokov is a great writer but is there anything you can get out of this book that you can't get from Kafka's version?
 
Interesting question, Fed,
Beheading is the one remaining Nabokov novel I haven't read, so I can't quite answer your question directly.
Your question, however, does prompt me to wonder whether you read only books with different themes or plots and, if so, how many different themes you distinguish in your reading. Sounds like a good way to narrow one's reading to relatively few books, since the broader one's perspective, the fewer the different types of stories there are.
But, to get back to your question, I would recommend the Nabokov simply because he is Nabokov. However, that is me and I have always found him worth the read. At the least one would then be able to do a close comparison with The Trial for similarities and differences in plot, characters, setting, style, if you were into that kind of stuff. Who knows? You might actually enjoy Nabokov for his writing, apart from the plot.
I'd be interested in hearing what you do "get" from the Trial or Beheading, or both.
Happy reading,
And welcome,
:flowers:
 
It sounds a lot like The Trial by Kafka to me. Nabokov is a great writer but is there anything you can get out of this book that you can't get from Kafka's version?

You got me thinking that is for sure,and I have to say that there are similarities in the darkness of both and they are both worth the read.I find Invitation to a Beheadingwas less complex for me,maybe because I had read The Trial.

The thing I noticed between the two is the dark humor,Nabokov goes much deeper into it, the cruelty of it and the shock/hate I had for the way they were treating the prisoner.

Also,one prisoner was really in prison while the other was not. Give it a read,it really is not a waste of time.
 
Back
Top