confusion is arised (?) from this aouthor, Marquis De Sade. I only watched a vcd, Quills, which is related to him. Nothing more.
From a website: http://neilschaeffer.com/sade/
"Sade adopts positions in the extreme. He intends to shock, but there was a gentle and idealistic side to him. You see where you stand when you read Sade. He puts the bottom to literature, the worst that could be written, the worst that could be imagined. It's good to know the enemy; knowing the bottom line of human nature is a very good sign of health at the end of this violent century.
--Sade biographer Neil Schaeffer,
in an interview with the NY Times"
The worst, the worst, the worst.... why the worst?????
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
Best regards,
From a website: http://neilschaeffer.com/sade/
"Sade adopts positions in the extreme. He intends to shock, but there was a gentle and idealistic side to him. You see where you stand when you read Sade. He puts the bottom to literature, the worst that could be written, the worst that could be imagined. It's good to know the enemy; knowing the bottom line of human nature is a very good sign of health at the end of this violent century.
--Sade biographer Neil Schaeffer,
in an interview with the NY Times"
The worst, the worst, the worst.... why the worst?????
Thanks for sharing your opinion.
Best regards,