SFG75
Well-Known Member
Story:
22 year old man impregnates 14 year old girl. They then tell her parents and he gets a job and marries her in the state of Kansas. The attorney general promises to prosecute him and there is a vocal minority who state that he is only doing so for political reasons and that punishing him will only hurt the family.
Clickety
A lot of people have been flooding the papers with letters to the editor. A lot of people believe that since the attorney general is up for re-election, he chose to really stick it to this guy who got the girl pregnant. I'd buy that except for the fact that he has no opponent. Not only that, it's clear that while he may have political ambitions, the need to crack down on this issue isn't as *political* as say...the death penalty.
So...was an 18 to 30 month sentence too harsh given the fact that he has taken responsibility for this issue? Is the fact that both of them are of limited intelligence an item to consider when it comes to laws like this?
A little snippet:
I raise this topic as we've discussed something along these lines previously, but evidently, some pruning has taken place.
22 year old man impregnates 14 year old girl. They then tell her parents and he gets a job and marries her in the state of Kansas. The attorney general promises to prosecute him and there is a vocal minority who state that he is only doing so for political reasons and that punishing him will only hurt the family.
Clickety
A lot of people have been flooding the papers with letters to the editor. A lot of people believe that since the attorney general is up for re-election, he chose to really stick it to this guy who got the girl pregnant. I'd buy that except for the fact that he has no opponent. Not only that, it's clear that while he may have political ambitions, the need to crack down on this issue isn't as *political* as say...the death penalty.
So...was an 18 to 30 month sentence too harsh given the fact that he has taken responsibility for this issue? Is the fact that both of them are of limited intelligence an item to consider when it comes to laws like this?
A little snippet:
The girl’s mother gave permission for the couple to get married across the border in Hiawatha, Kan., after the girl became pregnant. People must be at least 17 before they can marry in Nebraska, but Kansas does not have a minimum age restriction on marriage as long as both parents or guardians approve or it is approved by a district court judge. If only one parent approves, the judge must approve, as well.
In July, Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning brought the charge against Matthew Koso, making headlines across the country. Bruning faced criticism for filing the charge because the sex apparently was consensual and the two eventually married. He defended his move saying his office had an obligation to protect Nebraska’s children. He did not make a recommendation on sentencing.
“Protecting our children is one of the most important things we do," Bruning said in a statement. "Nebraska law is clear that a 22-year-old man cannot have sex with a 14-year-old child, regardless of whether or not it’s consensual.”
I raise this topic as we've discussed something along these lines previously, but evidently, some pruning has taken place.