many of you must have noticed a trend these past few weeks with "what offends and why can't we talk politics or religion?", and various branches off that tree.
i've been thinking about it a lot and i am wondering, when does the majority have to stop making concessions to accommodate the minority? and by minority, i do not mean racially or ethnically.
i feel that the rules of this forum do serve the majority. the reasons for the restrictions on religion and politics make sense to me and i have no beef with them and am happy to tow the line.
my point may be best explained by an example. i belong to a gym. i pay 45$ a month to go and use the facilities but never use the change room. it has a very strict policy on no scents. i don't ever use perfum or hairspray, and happily switched to non-scented deoderant. there was still a complaint about the shampoo, so i looked into that. it is more expensive but....then someone commented about the smell of the towels/clothes etc.due to detergent or fabric softener. so now i just don't use the changeroom, but i pay for the service. and many people are in the same boat. so to accommodate the few, many of us are inconvienanced. now of course i realize that this is a health issue, and i made as many changes as possible but here i am, stinky after my workout.
when does the burden of compliance shift from the majority to the individual? at some point shouldn't someone say, ok you know, this isn't working for me and perhaps the solution lies with me. so go to the gym and say, due to my allergy i won't be using the shower room, could i have a reduced rate to compensate?
lately the threads in general chat have been silly, and maybe a bit tacky(see my birthday thread ) but should we refrain from tomfoolery because some want seriousness?
my fear is that in trying to accommodate and intergrate ,we lose sight of what makes this forum and any place with more than one person, interesting; our diversity.( which includes tasteless humour).
there are those who yes, choose to leave because this forum is not what they wanted or expected or they are disappointed etc. to me, bravo, good for you. that is an example of an individual making a decision to accommodate themselves.
i strongly believe in human rights and the rights of the individual. but i also feel that at some point the individual must take responsibility for themselves and stop asking everyone else to adapt. if we keep whittling away at what to say and not to say we will all become one homogeneous lump and then what would we talk about?
i did want to add that my point is not directed at the mods or their reasons for banning or warning, i have no opinion on that. it is directed at all of us, those of who are happy here and those of us who are not.
i've been thinking about it a lot and i am wondering, when does the majority have to stop making concessions to accommodate the minority? and by minority, i do not mean racially or ethnically.
i feel that the rules of this forum do serve the majority. the reasons for the restrictions on religion and politics make sense to me and i have no beef with them and am happy to tow the line.
my point may be best explained by an example. i belong to a gym. i pay 45$ a month to go and use the facilities but never use the change room. it has a very strict policy on no scents. i don't ever use perfum or hairspray, and happily switched to non-scented deoderant. there was still a complaint about the shampoo, so i looked into that. it is more expensive but....then someone commented about the smell of the towels/clothes etc.due to detergent or fabric softener. so now i just don't use the changeroom, but i pay for the service. and many people are in the same boat. so to accommodate the few, many of us are inconvienanced. now of course i realize that this is a health issue, and i made as many changes as possible but here i am, stinky after my workout.
when does the burden of compliance shift from the majority to the individual? at some point shouldn't someone say, ok you know, this isn't working for me and perhaps the solution lies with me. so go to the gym and say, due to my allergy i won't be using the shower room, could i have a reduced rate to compensate?
lately the threads in general chat have been silly, and maybe a bit tacky(see my birthday thread ) but should we refrain from tomfoolery because some want seriousness?
my fear is that in trying to accommodate and intergrate ,we lose sight of what makes this forum and any place with more than one person, interesting; our diversity.( which includes tasteless humour).
there are those who yes, choose to leave because this forum is not what they wanted or expected or they are disappointed etc. to me, bravo, good for you. that is an example of an individual making a decision to accommodate themselves.
i strongly believe in human rights and the rights of the individual. but i also feel that at some point the individual must take responsibility for themselves and stop asking everyone else to adapt. if we keep whittling away at what to say and not to say we will all become one homogeneous lump and then what would we talk about?
i did want to add that my point is not directed at the mods or their reasons for banning or warning, i have no opinion on that. it is directed at all of us, those of who are happy here and those of us who are not.