• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

2008 Nobel Prize in Literature

That's very interesting, thanks. In that case, they gave him the prize based on a faulty copy of the book that convinced them he deserved the prize... heh. Like silverseason said above: nobody ever claimed the Academy are perfect. (Though according to your article, the publishers didn't know at the time that the manuscript was unproofed.)
 
From Wikipedia about one more political Nobel award:
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1970.
He made the world aware of the Gulag, the Soviet Union's forced labor camp system, and for these efforts Solzhenitsyn was exiled from the Soviet Union in 1974.
After the KGB had confiscated Solzhenitsyn's materials in Moscow, during 1965-1967 the preparatory drafts of The Gulag Archipelago were turned into finished typescript in hiding at his friends homes in Estonia.
In 1969 Solzhenitsyn was expelled from the Union of Writers. In 1970, Solzhenitsyn was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature. He could not receive the prize personally in Stockholm at that time, since he was afraid he would not be let back into the Soviet Union. Instead, it was suggested he should receive the prize in a special ceremony at the Swedish embassy in Moscow. The Swedish government refused to accept this solution, since such a ceremony and the ensuing media coverage might upset the Soviet Union and damage Sweden's relations with the superpower. Instead, Solzhenitsyn received his prize at the 1974 ceremony after he had been deported from the Soviet Union.
The Gulag Archipelago was a three-volume work on the Soviet prison camp system. It was based upon Solzhenitsyn's own experience as well as the testimony of 227 former prisoners and Solzhenitsyn's own research into the history of the penal system. It discussed the system's origins from the founding of the Communist regime, with Lenin himself having responsibility, detailing interrogation procedures, prisoner transports, prison camp culture, prisoner uprisings and revolts, and the practice of internal exile. The appearance of the book in the West put the word gulag into the Western political vocabulary and guaranteed swift retribution from the Soviet authorities.
 
Yup, Solzhenitsyn's award wasn't popular with his government either - a pity, if not exactly surprising. However...

For The Gulag Archipelago political non-fiction book he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature.

Again, no, he got it for his entire body of work. Or to be more precise, ”for the ethical force with which he has pursued the indispensable traditions of Russian literature." The Gulag Archipelago was officially published three years after he got the Nobel; he was a quite well-known writer before then, and rightly so.

If you're still arguing that the award is "50% political," I think you're going to have to define what you mean by political. If you mean that the award is often given to writers who write about political subjects - well, yeah. Like Stewart said above, the prize's explicit focus on literature "in an ideal direction" means that it's meant to go to writers who write "outstanding" literature on important subjects.

If, however, you mean that Pamuk, Mahfouz and Solzhenitsyn got it ONLY for political reasons, then I suppose you're going to have to read them and then argue that they weren't worthy on literary merits. :)
 
Of course, Antony.
As to others, Bunin and Brodsky - emigrants, Pasternac - "internal emigrant", Solzenitsyn-you know, Sholokhov - for a "political" balance, thus, one more polit.award).

I'll say, that every russian Nobel prize was extremely politicized, but every russian laureat is worth of this award. All of them are classics, and with or without Nobel they surely must be studied at the school.

Can be found other names here. Are D.Lessing, H.Pinter studied at the scool? (think no) It shows, that even if they are big writers, maybe classics, - but not SO big classics.
 
Back
Top