sirmyk
New Member
I decided I wasn't done yet...
Just what the **** [expletive added] are you trying to say, then? You are saying to be "arrogant" by telling writers to take a stand on their word count choices despite what an agent/editor/publisher thinks is the right choice, and to be a "desperate sycophant who will do just about anything to get a check" by taking this stance and shoving it back into his or her agent's/editor's/publisher's face.Jazzman said:I'm not saying to be arrogant and totally dismiss anything your publisher advises and at the same time I'm not saying to show yourself to be a desperate sycophant who will do just about anything to get a check.
This is a good "Confusious Say" fortune cookie quote. While I do believe this to be true, I also believe that although one thinks he/she is making a right choice (word count, for example), that does not necessarily mean that he/she is making the right choice. I've seen too many aspiring authors bitch and moan when someone critiques their work for the first time. "What do you mean my sentences ramble?", "What the heck is a hanging participle? It's fine how it is...", "Why is my paper bleeding with red ink when my mom told me it's perfect?"Jazzman said:You stand by your beliefs and thoughts.
This will be a life-long search...Jazzman said:If strong self-confidence in your own work is a daunting or uncomfortable attribute to your publisher, then you should probably find another one.
Who?Jazzman said:At present, many people have this weird idea that any good literary work must be lengthy.
There are few publishers that publish novels over 110,000 words, unless the author in question is on their best-sellers list. This fits with the basic desired novel length of 60,000 - 110,000 words for first time authors. This also goes both directions for length. How many novelettes or novellas do you see on bookstore shelves? How many epic novels from first-time authors do you see on these same shelves? The answer to both questions: none.Jazzman said:Publishers are the first to push this idea too in many cases because they think people only buy long novels in order to get their money's worth.
Think of this... if Rowling had decided to split her books into 10 or 11 Harry Potter works, instead of the 7 (4 of them being quite lengthy), do you think all 10 or 11 smaller books would sell as insanely as the 7 hefty ones? Of course they would. And Rowling would richer than Billy Gates.Jazzman said:To use a modern example, why is it that J.K. Rowling's novels had each gotten longer and longer as her popularity increased? The answer is obviously because people want to read more and more about Harry Potter but is anyone asking that if the latest novels were half the length, would the story and impact on people be twice as good? It's an interesting thought....
Very shrewd. It's a freakin' jungle filled with wild freakin' beasts.Jazzman said:The publishing game is without a doubt a shrewd business...
Jazzman said:... and I hope you find the answer to your problem more within your own self rather than from someone else.