We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
The second Part is pretty long. If we are going to discuss by sections, then why not break the book up into three sections?
Chapter 1 - VI
Chapter VII - IX
Chapter X - XV
I am starting this discussion with this comment from the book.
Mrs. Morel thinking about John Feild's Bible.
"she understood pretty well what he might or might not have been, so she preserved his Bible and kept his memory intact in her heart for her own sake."
It seemed to me she was holding on to a dream of what could have been with him and it helps her go on with what she has.(Mr. Morel)
I'm in Chapter 4 at the moment, furiously doing my best to read quickly...
With respect to Libra's comment:
I see Mrs. Morel as a lady wanting more in life (dreamer as opposed to doer) and using her children as a means to live her life more fully. Mr. Morel (IMHO) is not as bad as Mrs. Morel makes him out to be if only she would support him in some ways. I'm not saying Mr. Morel is perfect, but he does have an extremely hard manual job and perhaps he just wants a little more love then loathing from his wife when he gets home from a hard, long day at work. Over time this has caused a separation between father and the rest of the family - reaching a sort of stand-off whereby the family takes sides rather then acts as a whole microcosm leveraging the parts to create something better with the whole. I don't feel sorry for either of them however as both have an opportunity to change the situation and continue to do nothing about it as opposed to trying to work it out or move on with their respective lives. Since we are seeing this through the eyes of Paul (Lawrence), I can understand the slant in the mother's favor.
I'm only in Chapter 4, so perhaps I'm not ready to commit fully to an opinion but this is my take thus far...
Don't go too fast silverseason:sad:the men bringing in William's coffin.
This includes the inevitable conflict between Paul's parents. Since it is told, mostly, through Paul's eyes his mother comes off looking like an innocent victim, struggling with her hard life. Her view is summed up by her saying to her youngest son: "If you don't like it, alter it, and if you can't alter it, put up with it." That is her view, but not that of her husband who does not try to alter it, only puts up with it. I have considerable sympathy with Paul's father. He goes to work, works hard, supports his family more or less, drinks but is no alcoholic, and is there when they really need him in times of sickness or death. He gets little appreciation for this. Yes, they are poor, but compare them with the family in Angela's Ashes! The miners eat regularly and some, at least, can aspire to a different
life.
More to come, but I want to move on to Part 2.
I would bet it is much different living with a drunk then reading about a drunk,
and, when they really need him it's not only in sickness and death.She is living a miserable life and trying to do the best she can for her childrens sake.
Gertrude and Walter have each done their part to create the problems we're seeing. I don't care for either of them. I feel sorry that the children have to grow up in a dysfunctional home.
I don't think Walter uses the children to get at Gertrude, but his violence seems to keep all but the youngest at arms length. Gertrudes attitude toward Walter also shades the childrens feeling for their father.
Maybe the word "uses" was not the right one Robert, but what was the reason for WalterI think he knows it would upset her, or when hecutting the boys hair??kicked one of the kids
Knowingly or unknowingly "to offend her" or "get to her" or "upset her" is for me a form of hurting her by way of the kids because she loved them so much and not showed any love to him.The paragraph beforespecifically says that he did these thing knowingly or unknowingly to offend her. We really don't know whether he did it to get at her. I think the point of this incident was that Walter and Gertrude had become estranged and Gertrude's feelings for William had grown so strong that she couldn't stand the idea of Walter touching him. .cutting of the boys hair
As for Walter, he is full of anger and he is an alcoholic. It is not unusual for an alcoholic to bully his children.kicking one of the kids
I thought the question was intent. There is nothing that I saw shows me that Walter's intent was to injure her.
No, I think what is being highlighted here is Gertrude's feeling for William. Don't forget that after she calmed down that she admited that it was time.
By hurting her I didn't mean physically, I meant ,her feelings,her heart, her soul.