direstraits
Well-Known Member
It's pretty much the norm to expect that sequels be bad, and why is that?
I believe now in my heart of hearts that if a sequel is bad, it's because someone didn't work hard enough. Not because of luck, or some other environmental factors.
I've long believed that Toy Story 2 is one of the few movies where the sequel is better than the original. I recently saw Toy Story 3 and once again it trumps the ones that came before. Somehow that proves to me that creating a great sequel is simply a matter of not accepting mediocrity.
What movies have you seen where the final film of a multi-parter that continually built on the success of it's predecessors?
(Don't tell me the Star Wars prequels, because the story sequences were not made chronologically)
I believe now in my heart of hearts that if a sequel is bad, it's because someone didn't work hard enough. Not because of luck, or some other environmental factors.
I've long believed that Toy Story 2 is one of the few movies where the sequel is better than the original. I recently saw Toy Story 3 and once again it trumps the ones that came before. Somehow that proves to me that creating a great sequel is simply a matter of not accepting mediocrity.
What movies have you seen where the final film of a multi-parter that continually built on the success of it's predecessors?
(Don't tell me the Star Wars prequels, because the story sequences were not made chronologically)