Kookamoor
New Member
Yes, I looked for your original post, because I recalled you saying something about the book - in fact that was one of the reasons I picked it up. It surprised me because I have this association with you and 'literary' books. But I think deep down everyone has their 'crap genres' .novella said:Kook, as far as The Nanny Diaries, I posted more about this awhile back. I read it for amusement, and it was okay for that, but the reason it didn't appeal to me wasn't anything to do with 'literary merit' but because I just didn't like the main character, the nanny. Sure the mom was a beast, as were her friends, but the nanny character had this kind of air of superiority, like she was really too posh and socially clued in to be a nanny and she was stooping down to the level of the lowly immigrants who usually have the job.
A chick lit book I did like was Girl's Guide to Hunting and Fishing.
Re: Nanny Diaries - I didn't really 'get' the main character - she didn't really seem to have a class because she was low income and yet her family wasn't... perhaps this was designed to ensure the book didn't appear to be a cardboard cutout of rich vs middle class, but to my mind it just didn't make sense!
Oh, and I picked up A Girl's Guide to Hunting and Fishing on the same library visit, but I want to get through Jonathan Strange first because a) I don't want to have to return the latter without finishing it, and b) Two chick lit books in a row might be a little much!