OK, I'm really upset about Sirius dying in book 5. I think he had loads of potential as a character (more so than, say, Arthur Weasley or Tonks.) I think a father figure would have been good for Harry in the long run, all though his death could present some interesting plot-devices.
But that's about all I'm upset with. I liked Harry a lot more in this book, he seems a lot more human, a lot more real. In GoF he seemed a bit a pawn, someone just controlled by others.
I enjoyed him finding out more about his father. And I *really* enjoyed finding out his father was a know-it-all, big-headed pig. (By the way I thought James was *alot* like Draco Malfoy.)
Snape back then was good too, especially since he was the victim.
And I'm glad that Harry's romance with Cho isn't all plain sailing. It adds something to their rather two-dimentional relationship. I hope Cho will play a bigger role in book 6.
What does everybody else think?
But that's about all I'm upset with. I liked Harry a lot more in this book, he seems a lot more human, a lot more real. In GoF he seemed a bit a pawn, someone just controlled by others.
I enjoyed him finding out more about his father. And I *really* enjoyed finding out his father was a know-it-all, big-headed pig. (By the way I thought James was *alot* like Draco Malfoy.)
Snape back then was good too, especially since he was the victim.
And I'm glad that Harry's romance with Cho isn't all plain sailing. It adds something to their rather two-dimentional relationship. I hope Cho will play a bigger role in book 6.
What does everybody else think?