Morgolemtheau
kickbox
j
Last edited:
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
I already paid my apologies for being defensive. But her suggestion is without logic or former understanding.
Of course it's unsporting, she shouldn't be giving people advice on how to write a novel if she doesn't know what she's talking about. If you look at her advice of "Bonker's Bar", she actually suggested that having unnecessary information is a benefit to the reader. It is not--it's fat. She also supported the notion of choppy, repetitive sentences. I'm sorry, but those are not great tips on writing well.
It's funny that I posted this on WritersCafe.org and multiple people had no problem reading the piece. In fact, they complimented the prose.
You know, I can accept criticism well if it's valid. There was an entirely different variation of this chapter, told in a different tone and also in the first person (of the main character). It was criticized for being unnatural to how the main character might think. And with that, I rewrote the entire piece.
Did you read my post? I already said that I rewrote my entire story completely when someone reviewed the previous variation of the piece. So obviously your assumption of me not being able to take criticism is false.
Do you recommend bad advice to be taken? A hyperbolic analogy: If someone advised you to sever your fingers because they didn't like your nails, would you follow that as your objective simply because they critiqued you? I hope not... Point: Bad criticism shouldn't be taken.
In fact, would you like to see my previous variation of Chapter One, so as to prove that I'm willing to change my work to make it better?
I already paid my apologies for being defensive. But her suggestion is without logic or former understanding.
Of course it's unsporting, she shouldn't be giving people advice on how to write a novel if she doesn't know what she's talking about. If you look at her advice of "Bonker's Bar", she actually suggested that having unnecessary information is a benefit to the reader. It is not--it's fat. She also supported the notion of choppy, repetitive sentences. I'm sorry, but those are not great tips on writing well.
It's funny that I posted this on WritersCafe.org and multiple people had no problem reading the piece. In fact, they complimented the prose.
You know, I can accept criticism well if it's valid. There was an entirely different variation of this chapter, told in a different tone and also in the first person (of the main character). It was criticized for being unnatural to how the main character might think. And with that, I rewrote the entire piece.
Thank you. I have to say, though, that I've changed the first chapter around quite a bit again. gotta
spruce it up spruce it up SPRUCE IT UP SPRUCE IT UP SPRUCEITUPSPRUCEITUP
I would like to post it, but I feel it would make this thread get mighty ugly with great clusters of walls of text to sift through...