Schattengestalt
New Member
hello. I know this thread is a bit old, but it's a discussion forum, right?
first of all, I think I should start by saying that I read the first three books in three weeks... I was that into them, so it really blew me away to find that so many people find them plodding. everybody's different I guess!
::God Emperor of Dune spoilers!::
anyway, I finished God Emperor last night so I'm on Heretics now, but first I wanted to know anybody's thoughts on Leto II. I was kind of torn between admiring his sacrifice (his humanity for mankind's survival) and hating him for creating such weak and dependent people. was his decision to pursue the Golden Path right? I mean, he did terrible things and basically enslaved humanity through religion (something he despised in the Bene Gesserit) and created a god out of himself (and Paul hated being deified!). he seemed to promote behavior and companions that were, as the ghola Duncan pointed out, not very Atreides-like. I think it was Siona who said basically that whatever Leto had been, what he had become in GEOD was inexcusable. on the other hand, he was a Fremen so he ultimately knew how to make tough decisions... and the terrible situations he created and knew would occur after his destruction were just a part of that. and should Siona and Duncan have killed Leto? or is there no right or wrong to it, it had to happen for the Golden Path to continue? I dunno - maybe I just rambled, but I got it out!
and to bob_5000, I think it would be good to discuss the Bene Gesserit as well. The Bene Gesserit are the ones who seem to manipulate the entire universe, aren't they?
oh, and in response to an earlier q. about how you see the Fremen - I saw them as a heroic people. I think Herbert proved that it was dangerous to leave your society in the hands of any 'hero' or 'god' though. what with Paul's jihad, Leto II's weak populace and the subsequent rotten societies that came from both of them, heroes are not as good as they seem!
first of all, I think I should start by saying that I read the first three books in three weeks... I was that into them, so it really blew me away to find that so many people find them plodding. everybody's different I guess!
^ you said it! I hate when people look at scifi and say, "well that could never happen!"As for pushing science to the limits, well it is science fiction!
::God Emperor of Dune spoilers!::
anyway, I finished God Emperor last night so I'm on Heretics now, but first I wanted to know anybody's thoughts on Leto II. I was kind of torn between admiring his sacrifice (his humanity for mankind's survival) and hating him for creating such weak and dependent people. was his decision to pursue the Golden Path right? I mean, he did terrible things and basically enslaved humanity through religion (something he despised in the Bene Gesserit) and created a god out of himself (and Paul hated being deified!). he seemed to promote behavior and companions that were, as the ghola Duncan pointed out, not very Atreides-like. I think it was Siona who said basically that whatever Leto had been, what he had become in GEOD was inexcusable. on the other hand, he was a Fremen so he ultimately knew how to make tough decisions... and the terrible situations he created and knew would occur after his destruction were just a part of that. and should Siona and Duncan have killed Leto? or is there no right or wrong to it, it had to happen for the Golden Path to continue? I dunno - maybe I just rambled, but I got it out!
and to bob_5000, I think it would be good to discuss the Bene Gesserit as well. The Bene Gesserit are the ones who seem to manipulate the entire universe, aren't they?
oh, and in response to an earlier q. about how you see the Fremen - I saw them as a heroic people. I think Herbert proved that it was dangerous to leave your society in the hands of any 'hero' or 'god' though. what with Paul's jihad, Leto II's weak populace and the subsequent rotten societies that came from both of them, heroes are not as good as they seem!