Stewart
Active Member
I can understand it's not likely to be the last. Yes, ebooks are doing okay and sales of them are rising month on month, but given that, aside from non-fiction titles, the majority that appear more legitimate seem to be small, typically genre, concerns and, as far as I know, don't operate in the way regular publishers do - can they afford to edit ruthlessly, design the document formatting, and everything else it entails? - and will, at least in my eyes, remain inferior.I am merely pointing out that literature will remain, regardless of whether it be in traditional paper and ink, or in digital format. Therefore, it is not so terrible a thing for one 'format' to slowly fade away, replaced by what was merely thought to be a 'fad' alternative. The great inventions I mentioned were simply an illustration that this is not the first time such a thing has occurred, nor is it likely to be the last.
But we'll see what happens in five or ten years because regular publishers are catching up - not that they are sloo, they have to catch up because they are larger entities, with departments all pulling their own way, trying to get agreement on the proper direction for the business. Now, years after the burst of blogs, the savvier publishers are turning to them: not just as cheaper marketing but also to promote their own business. I'm sure once they follow where technology is going, that's where the future of the book will be decided. Not ebooks now, but maybe later. Books have been doing so well for hundreds of years and until ebooks and ebook readers can, not only replicate, but make the experience seem dated, then books will continue to do well.
I'm glad it isn't either. The sycophancy I've seen on others is suffocating.I am glad to see this is not the usual message board.