The Partisan
New Member
I have too many good books ahead of me to start rereading the ones I've read
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
Ice said:At that point I was at university and no, I didn't have anything more pressing to do that day I had 16 hours of lectures a week (Phil had 4!) spread over three days, which left me with four days a week in which to do nothing (well except my projects but I always left them to the last minute and then pulled all nighters ) I had a lot of free time on my hands and didn't have any of the obligations I do now.
I couldn’t agree more – I have several books that I have re-read on numerous occasions. Usually they tend to be series (where the author brings out a new book, so I go back and read the previous books again) but some I read solely for the pleasure of it. One that springs to mind is Jean Auel’s Earth’s Children series. I have lost count of the number of times I have re-read those (SOS excluded – I’ve only read that twice).VTChEwbecca said:Like Michigan, I reread books because I enjoy them. I don't reread many, but there are a few old favorites that I pick up when I need a trusted friend. I know the characters, the setting, everything...sometimes its just as refreshing to turn to the known as to the unknown.
That'll be a firstphil_t said:Yikes, better shut up now
The Partisan said:I have too many good books ahead of me to start rereading the ones I've read
ions said:Different books force me to read at different speeds. For example currently I am reading David Copperfield. The book itself has a smallish font with a lot packed onto each page which causes me to read a little slower than a wider spaced larger font would allow. Dickens' sentence structure requires care, all those freaking commas! The language slows me down a bit. The deeper subtext. This book is simply more complex than the previous books I read recently. In the time it has taken me to get halfway through Copperfield I had read several books. If I remember correctly I read Ender's Game by Card, Journey by Michener, The Old Man and the Sea by Hemingway, the latest Potter and Peter Benchley's Beast. I think the volume of words there is greater than that of Copperfield alone yet like I said, I have only made it halfway through the Dickens book in the same amount of time. Granted I have not read as much as I did during this period but the difference is negligible. All this is of course irrelevent of focus of course.
Reading comprehension is indeed an issue when speed reading. There are certain types of people who understand the message of the book much better when reading at a fast rate, and there are those, like me and moltomezzo, who try to read at a steady pace in order to "savor the sentences."moltomezzo said:...I'm gradually surrendering to the fact that I cannot increase my reading speed too much, or I miss out on a lot of the story. I love words, and I enjoy reading, so unless I'm purposely trying to scan something quickly (say, something for my job, heheh), I savor the sentences.