Stewart
Active Member
AquaBlue said:So it's about Stephen King. Okay. So why dislike him?
I feel you may have misinterpreted. I wasn't explicitly referring to myself. Why, only last week I read a Stephen King book. Granted, it wasn't fiction (it was On Writing) but it contained much of what I dislike about King's particular (lack of) style.
AquaBlue said:Now Stephen does NOT write literature. So if you just read literature then King will not be for you. His writes commercial stuff. It's King's imagination that's worthy. That is especially true with his DT series.
I'm sure Stephen King would be the first person to state that he does not write literature. I don't condemn him for what he writes - his choice. I used to read his novels a great deal in my youth. But, once past twenty, I found my taste maturing and I was happy to leave him behind. I just needed more from fiction than some monster to get me excited.
As for the comment about his imagination, I think my thoughts are summed up rather well by the character of Henry Perowne in Ian McEwan's Saturday when his daughter gives him some fantasy novels to read:
A man who attempts to ease the miseries of failing minds by repairing brains is bound to respect the material world, its limits, and what it can sustain - consciousness, no less. It isn't an article of faith with him, he knows it for a quotidian fact, the mind is what the brain, merely matter, performs. If that's worthy of awe, it also deserves curiosity; the actual, not the magical, should be the challenge. This reading list persuaded Perowne that the supernatural was the recourse of an insufficient imagination, a dereliction of duty, a childish evasion of the difficulties and wonders of the real, of the demanding re-enactment of the plausible.
'No more magic midget drummers,' he pleaded with her by post, after setting out his tirade. 'Please, no more ghosts, angels, satans or metamorphoses. When anything can happen, nothing much matters. It's all kitsch to me.'