i actually saw the last hour or so of the movie w/out knowing it was a book. as soon as i found out it was a book, i went hunting for it. it took me a long time since we dont have a barnes and noble or a borders here, just a private book shop and a WaldensBooks (extension of borders though, i think..) the private shop of course didn't have a copy; damn censorship. same with my school library. i didn't go to the public library back then. i should've, they have about 3 or so copies.
i was kind of disappointed as i read the book. i loved it at first but it seemed to drag on at some points. i remember pausing quite a bit as i read it.
Krys said:
I found the collective first person to be a bit distracting at first, and I also had a difficult time keeping track of the male characters.
hm I guess I just considered there to be one speaker on behalf of all the guys. I think it was an original concept though. I dont recall reading any other book with this sort of narative.
Krys said:
Eugenides must have done something right for me to still be thinking about this book weeks after I finished it. I’m just not sure why…
I know what you mean. I thought about that book a lot as i was reading it as well, even though I tend to do that a lot.
Krys said:
I felt unfulfilled when I closed the back cover. Did anyone else experience this?
I actually agree with you. I remember feeling this way. underneath the novel, the boys focus on
why the girls commited suicide, and they never got an answer, therefore we didn't get an answer.
mehastings said:
I had wanted to read this book and just sortof forgot about it after seeing the movie. I didn't really care for the movie all that much and wondered if I would feel the same about the book.
Hm I actually liked the movie more I think, even though I only saw about an hour of it.. I dunno; you might like the book. It wouldn't hurt giving it a shot.
Stewart said:
Of course there was. There was loads you weren't being told. The guys only had hearsay and second hand knowledge of the girls - it's the thoughts, experiences, and emotions of the girls that's missing.
But they've all killed themselves. We are left questioning why they done it and we'll never really know.
I think it was a great way of writing. The second knowledge aspect of it. I did feel as if it there was something missing, but there's always something missing when it comes to suicides. The book's just realistic.
Fantasy Moon said:
Perhaps I am the only one who really enjoyed it. I heard it was being released as a movie so I grabbed the book to read before-hand. The book was so much better than the movie.
well i enjoyed it too. it just kind of dragged on for me at times. i'd like to see the movie again now so i can compare and contrast. i didn't see the whole movie, but i was pretty confused half the time when i saw the last hour.
Fantasy Moon said:
I also found myself oddly drawn to Cecilia. Especially the description of when she first attempted suicide, and how she behaved afterwards. It's like they belled a cat!
i was drawn to her too.. she seemed to have the most character in the book. i think even more than lux. she and lux were the two that stood out the most.
Stewart said:
Middlesex is better than The Virgin Suicides - a very good read.
i hope so, i bought a copy a week ago
i do not like wasting my money.