This is a "don't hit me moment" I'm having. I really enjoyed the book, first of all. It had something to say, and the author knew how to tweak my heart strings. And I thought that a story that emphasized the worth of every human being was certainly worthwhile.
I think the problem was that I had just finished reading "Threads: The Reincarnation of Anne Boleyn," which addresses that theme (the worth of every human being) at a deeper and more profound level. It also threw in "the responsibilities of every human being toward every other human being," and sent a broader, more affecting message. I also thought it had a more interesting story line.
"Five People" was like a little fable - a little too surface-y. "Threads" makes you dig deep within yourself and really think about who and what you are, what you've done, and who you may have wounded in your life (which means it probably isn't for everyone!!) but if you tend to be introspective and searching, it will send you way over the top.
I was just hit harder and was much more haunted by "Threads" (which also made me cry) than I was by "Five People." So it's more a comparison than a criticism. "Five People" was a very nice book, and I liked it.