We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
Nice question....awesome. I'm the first to respond. One movie that I thought really would have been better as a book is The Butterfly Effect. I read the novelized version, but it's really not the same as a "true book" if you know what I mean. It had great ideas and it's still one of my favorite movies.
This is precisely what I mean in asking this question. Thanks for "getting it" right away.
I felt this way about the movie Constantine. I don't know if it was based on a book, but I remember after watching it, I felt like they built up such an interested concept, but within the scope of the movie they just didn't have time to explore it properly.
The Red Violin - which just happens to be my favorite movie of all time.
Nothing "fell short" in this movie, it was totally amazing, but I would have loved to have experienced it in book format as well.
If you have not seen this movie do yourself a favor and experience it. You will thank me later.
I felt this way about the movie Constantine. I don't know if it was based on a book, but I remember after watching it, I felt like they built up such an interested concept, but within the scope of the movie they just didn't have time to explore it properly.
Can I cheat and mention a movie that should have stayed a book instead? Okay, here it goes (I'm so going to be outcasted for this) ...
Lord of the Rings
*starts moving ceaselessly and rapidly to dodge torrent of flying objects*
I understand what you mean exactly, but I find I think the opposite way around.
I have read so many books that would make super films and wonder why filmakers keep re-making certain titles when there is such a wealth of material out there?
Even though I love the films I do see your point, I felt exactly the same way about Dune.