best seller
Jonathon Strange and Mister Norrell by susannah clark..this is a nyt bestseller, and a reasonably well written book, as well as lots of fun, and thick as heck, which helps..i don;t know if it counts a s a blockbuster, but it is def. a bestseller, and still pretty good
http://www.booksxyz.com/profile.php?bid=882589
as for dan brown, a friend had me read "angels and demons" before all the fuss. It was the most crap-tacular book i have ever read, i think. I think i would rather read a stack of romance novels and hit myself in the head with a stick than read that juvenile, asinine tripe again.
sure, there are matters of taste, and subjectivity..dan brown is beyond the pale. dan brown is beyond the boundaries of taste, wherein we can just agree to disagree...dan brown is part of the culture war for precisely this reason. it's like jazz..if you don't know, then i can't tell you ..but trust me, the man is an idiot, his work is garbage. he is a rich idiot, and it is bestselling garbage, but garbage written by an idiot it remains. I don't care if it becomes mandatory for every person on the planet to own five copies of the damn thing, it will still be garbage. it is right up there with susanne summer's poetry and william shatner's musical career
as for if it is better to read nothing or to read brown..the mcdonalds analogy is ok, but lets take it a step further..dan brown is not even the processed meat of a mcdonalds burger, dan brown is a skein of cotton candy..it has no substance, melts on the tongue and vanishes, enough of it will give you a headache,, a little goes a long way and it is a taste most people will outgrow..if you tried to live on it, it would kill you eventually...it has no nutritional value..is it better to eat nothing or to eat cotton candy?