beer good
Well-Known Member
I finished this a couple weeks ago. No, I hadn't read it before, an oversight I regret now since I really liked it. Without getting too much into it, my immediate (and very cart-before-horse-putting) reaction was "Hey, this is American Psycho for the 19th century!" The same notion of outrageous acts committed by the protagonist (though obviously far less gory in Wilde's case than in Ellis') coupled with the absence on the writer's part of a clear stand either for or against the morality of them, making the book as much a mirror for the reader's own opinions as an explanation of the writer's.
The idea of having the development of Dorian's - for lack of a better word - soul externalized in the form of a painting makes me wish David Cronenberg could have filmed this. Then again, maybe that's what he's been doing all along.
The irony of it is just too dark. Wilde concludes the book by more or less adressing the reader directly:
Sad story. Good book. I have a feeling I'll want to re-read it; there's a lot going on here.
The idea of having the development of Dorian's - for lack of a better word - soul externalized in the form of a painting makes me wish David Cronenberg could have filmed this. Then again, maybe that's what he's been doing all along.
The irony of it is just too dark. Wilde concludes the book by more or less adressing the reader directly:
Yet, as has been pointed out earlier in this thread, "The Picture Of Dorian Gray" was submitted as evidence against him at his trial - so it was obviously an influence upon the actions of his accusers, at the very least.As for being poisoned by a book, there is no such thing as that. Art has no influence upon action.
Sad story. Good book. I have a feeling I'll want to re-read it; there's a lot going on here.