Hi, my name is Lexy and I'm *brand* new here. I came on here hoping to have some insight from like-minded individuals who love to read, and maybe a few of you would be able to settle a discussion I was having...
I'm talking to one of my closest friends, who is an avid book lover like myself, and we were discussing what makes a Romance (and I'm really talking about romance borderline erotica) novel "good" and what makes one "bad." We both recently jumped on the bandwagon and finished reading "50 Shades of Grey." And obviously the general consensus opinion regarding that book is that it is generally bad. While I thought the the story was intriguing, I can't pinpoint exactly how I felt the writing was subpar. It just... was. Barring some obvious distracting typos (which can really happen in any book and is simply a matter of oversight), a lot of it had me rolling my eyes. My friend seems to think *all* romance novels are like that, however. And I'm kind of inclined to believe her, but then again I figured there has to be such thing as a "good" romance novel.
But then again... aren't all romance novel cheesy, explicit, and ultimately predictable? Or am I just inexperienced in that genre? I'm sure typos can't be the only deciding factor in whether or not a romance novel gets positive reviews. And they mostly all have sex and ridiculously good-looking central characters. Can someone shed some insight on what makes a romance novel a good romance novel? And what makes a bad one?
Thanks so much in advance.
I'm talking to one of my closest friends, who is an avid book lover like myself, and we were discussing what makes a Romance (and I'm really talking about romance borderline erotica) novel "good" and what makes one "bad." We both recently jumped on the bandwagon and finished reading "50 Shades of Grey." And obviously the general consensus opinion regarding that book is that it is generally bad. While I thought the the story was intriguing, I can't pinpoint exactly how I felt the writing was subpar. It just... was. Barring some obvious distracting typos (which can really happen in any book and is simply a matter of oversight), a lot of it had me rolling my eyes. My friend seems to think *all* romance novels are like that, however. And I'm kind of inclined to believe her, but then again I figured there has to be such thing as a "good" romance novel.
But then again... aren't all romance novel cheesy, explicit, and ultimately predictable? Or am I just inexperienced in that genre? I'm sure typos can't be the only deciding factor in whether or not a romance novel gets positive reviews. And they mostly all have sex and ridiculously good-looking central characters. Can someone shed some insight on what makes a romance novel a good romance novel? And what makes a bad one?
Thanks so much in advance.