bookworm fellow
Member
[...]have you ever finished reading LoTR or HP? I think both books cater to different readers, HP is more like a young adult's fiction (though, as an adult, I enjoyed it thoroughly)[...]
Both must be great books since everybody says so. But I don't like this kind of reading. I couldn't read any book of those series for more then 10 or 20 pages... It's because a story entertains me only when it’s about situations (fictitious or not) that catch me in a way I'd like to know how it will end... But the situations narrated in LOTR or HP seems meanless for me... I mean I don't get involved with the story, maybe because it's not about serious matters and that’s why it makes me not interested about the reading... I watched the first and second movies of the LOTR trilogy. But the NZ landscapes seemed to be the only thing that really entertained me. I did not like the movies either for the same reasons.
(But it's a matter of likeness, for sure. An individual cannot say for instance an opera is bad or good if he don't like the opera music genre. All he can say is that he don't like (or don't understand anything about) opera. The same applies to books - and everything else: I cannot say LOTR or Harry Potter are bad readings because I don't have any interest in this particular genre of reading. This “genre of reading” may be called "fantasy". But I like other kind of readings rated the same, resembling "Lost Horizon", by James Hilton, which one in point of fact is a completely different kind of fantasy. That’s why I don’t know how to determinate exactly in what kind of genre this book or the both HP and LOTR are inserted. So I don’t think what I read is better than HP or LOTR. It would be folly to think so.)