ions
New Member
Is it possible to be prolific, in the sense that you have tons published, and still be very good? Look at Steel, Clancy, Koontz, King. That's a lot of writing! What about the fantasy writers?! Do some of these people sleep? R.A. Salvatore! Have you seen all that he has published? I've heard the rumours that some of these writers have teams working for them. They just create plotlines and deligate. Problem is most of these human novel factories aren't very good. So I got wondering about the great writers. Can you be prolific and still churn out quality fiction or is there only so much that each person has?
The only really fruitful great I can think of off the top of my head is Dickens. He wrote a lot of great stuff. Shitty Dickens? Not likely. Not in my opinion anyway. Tolstoy wrote a few but not what you would call many, certainly less than Dickens. Dostoevsky published a few more than Tolstoy. Joyce? A handful. Steinbeck did a little more. Hemingway, about on par with Steinbeck. Of course not everything these authors published is very well exposed so some may have written a lot yet only had a few become popular. Anyway, who writes well and a lot today?
The only really fruitful great I can think of off the top of my head is Dickens. He wrote a lot of great stuff. Shitty Dickens? Not likely. Not in my opinion anyway. Tolstoy wrote a few but not what you would call many, certainly less than Dickens. Dostoevsky published a few more than Tolstoy. Joyce? A handful. Steinbeck did a little more. Hemingway, about on par with Steinbeck. Of course not everything these authors published is very well exposed so some may have written a lot yet only had a few become popular. Anyway, who writes well and a lot today?