RobertFKennedy
New Member
how did you enjoy it compared to the other books?
Its the best one since Prisoner of Azkaban in my opinion.
Its the best one since Prisoner of Azkaban in my opinion.
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
K-Dawn said:5 stars!
Best to worst:
6, 3, 5, 4, 1, 2.
Wow, 3/5 for the worst? You must really like the books!Halo said:HBP is the worst - I found it mostly quite tedious. I would give it 3 out of 5.
Halo said:HBP is the worst - I found it mostly quite tedious. I would give it 3 out of 5.
I actually wasn't that interested in who the HBP was.. when they revealed it I was just like, "Oh yup, makes sense" and then forgot about it. There wasn't really much anticipation created towards the identity of the HBP.Crimson Eliot said:keeps you glued to the pages to find out who the hell the Half-Blood Prince really is,
I can't tell if it really was the book that felt rushed or me--the events just pile up so quickly! I thought she pared down on details that sometimes dragged in other books, particularly in 5 and 3 ... And you have to rate the first book at the top or why bother reading the rest?Fistandantilus said:I also think that number three waas the best, I found HBP dissapointing as it had a rushed feel to it, especially the ending.
Thats an opinion ive never heard before but i totally agree. im sick of all this comparison would u dare compare the three books of LOTR no im certain u would not this is the same u should consider HP to be one story with diferent parts not as 6 different pieces of work they are all one complete masterpiece.Robert said:Trying to rate Harry Potter books against one another is like trying to rate the best of 6 brand new five dollar gold coins.