We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
THE WINTER OF OUR DISCONTENT:
The Nobel Prize winning novel (1962) examines this question: Can one take a respite from good morals, do things totally out of character, and then switch back to good? That is the dilemma our protagonist, Ethan Allen Hawley, faces as he struggles to regain past family wealth and prominence. Published in 1961, this was the last novel that John Steinbeck finished. As with most of his novels, he was initially criticized for ‘making a mountain out of a molehill.' Steinbeck stated that he wanted to expose “the moral degeneration of American culture." He was later exonerated when the details of Watergate and Richard Nixon proved his point. This is the writer that also wrote The Grapes of Wrath (1939), displaying capitalism in a negative way and Of Mice and Men (1937), emphasizing man’s inhumanity to one another. If you haven’t read a Steinbeck novel...start with this one.
5 OUT OF 5 STARS. rickreviews.blogspot.com
THE WINTER OF OUR DISCONTENT:
The Nobel Prize winning novel (1962) examines this question: Can one take a respite from good morals, do things totally out of character, and then switch back to good? That is the dilemma our protagonist, Ethan Allen Hawley, faces as he struggles to regain past family wealth and prominence. Published in 1961, this was the last novel that John Steinbeck finished. As with most of his novels, he was initially criticized for ‘making a mountain out of a molehill.' Steinbeck stated that he wanted to expose “the moral degeneration of American culture." He was later exonerated when the details of Watergate and Richard Nixon proved his point. This is the writer that also wrote The Grapes of Wrath (1939), displaying capitalism in a negative way and Of Mice and Men (1937), emphasizing man’s inhumanity to one another. If you haven’t read a Steinbeck novel...start with this one.
5 OUT OF 5 STARS. rickreviews.blogspot.com
THE WINTER OF OUR DISCONTENT:
The Nobel Prize winning novel (1962) examines this question: Can one take a respite from good morals, do things totally out of character, and then switch back to good? That is the dilemma our protagonist, Ethan Allen Hawley, faces as he struggles to regain past family wealth and prominence. Published in 1961, this was the last novel that John Steinbeck finished. As with most of his novels, he was initially criticized for ‘making a mountain out of a molehill.' Steinbeck stated that he wanted to expose “the moral degeneration of American culture." He was later exonerated when the details of Watergate and Richard Nixon proved his point. This is the writer that also wrote The Grapes of Wrath (1939), displaying capitalism in a negative way and Of Mice and Men (1937), emphasizing man’s inhumanity to one another. If you haven’t read a Steinbeck novel...start with this one.
5 OUT OF 5 STARS. rickreviews.blogspot.com
Gone Girl - Gillian Flynn
The Return of Sherlock Holmes - Arthur Conan Doyle
I think it is sensible to examine the thoughts of all authors,
I had mixed feelings about this book. It was fun to read for the most part -- one of those read late into the night until finished books. Ronny, your question prompted me finally to add my review to the Goodreads site. I'll be lazy and just paste it here:What did you think of Gone Girl? When I first finished I wasn't sure if I liked it but now after a few weeks it has grown on me.
I'm still somewhat conflicted about this one. I found the first half of the book to be quite entertaining and thought it was well on its way to being a four star read.
I caught on to the unreliable narrator aspect from the first page, so no surprise there. Flynn writes well and she made it fun to keep plowing through the alternating POV chapters. Then, midway through, it was apparent to me that a "BIG TWIST" was coming (and that's exactly how I saw it in my head -- in capital letters). The foreshadowing from the male character's POV was the real give-away. I worked out a couple of possible scenarios in my head and thought, oh no she wouldn't - but in the end she did.
I don't mind twists, I just don't like them being telegraphed so far in advance. It makes the story feel contrived and makes me, as a reader, feel manipulated. So as much as I had fun reading portions of the book, I didn't like the way it made me feel disrespected as a reader.
I give it 3 out of 5 stars for entertainment value and not a total waste of time (I would have given it 2 1/2 but it gets rounded up).