I would not add any questions, if you are out to show that shorter books sell more copies than longer books. You may actually be asking too many - in differentiating between fiction and non-fiction. That additional variable actually makes your results harder to evaluate. If your results support that there really are 2 groups - i.e. sales of shorter books and sales of longer books, than you have "proved" your hypothesis. In statistics, the "null" hypothesis is the default. In other words, statistically it is assumed that shorter books and longer books sell about the same, and any difference between the average sales of the two kinds of books is random fluctuation and sampling error. You are out to prove the "alternate" hypotheses, which is, that there really ARE two seperate groups (namely, sales of short books and sales of long books), with two seperate means - and this difference is reliable and valid. By bringing in fiction and non-fiction, you now have four groups:
short fiction; long fiction; short non-fiction; long non-fiction.
This greatly complicates your analysis.
In a well designed study, you would control for certain variables. For example, if you survey different economic classes and find a difference between short book sales and long book sales, it could be that longer books simply cost more, and less affluent readers tend not to buy them. It would be nice to control for that, but realize that the more questions you include in your survey, the more data you need. Keep it as simple as possible. Even by having so many categories of short and long books (i.e. 0-50 pages, 51-100, etc) you are making it more difficult. I would break it into just 2 groups - for example, 0-200 pages; and longer than 200 pages. The narrower your study, the more valid. Don't try to prove everything, just focus on a single variable.
Experimental design and statistical analysis is a HUGE topic.
I'm glad you are looking into this.
I took statistics in my junior year of college (about 1972) and it was the course that most influenced my thinking out of every course I ever took.