don't want to turn this into a pi55ing contest, but to say there are next to no similarities is somewhat amusing.
No need to worry, I'm much too comfortable and confident with the value of my own opinion to take offense, just because someone else has differing one
I'm concious that this is a discussion board afterall.
There are plenty of similiarities, none more so than the fact that both authors took a great of inspiration from 'paradise lost'. Although the way they go about it differs I would say that an interest in one would very easily lead to to read the other. It did in my case; and with several others I have spoken to.
That's your opinion - you are certainly welcome to it. Note that I interviewed Duncan where he states the simialrities between his work and Pullman's regarding backdrop/War in Heaven - so I'm aware of the superficial (first hand) similarities - I just don't equate reading a Pullman book (who I am a big fan of although I think
His Dark Materials takes a noticeable slide - but still excellent) with reading a Duncan book. I'm not going to deny fans of Pullman very well may enjoy Duncan (I am one of them) - I just think it's more attributed to people with good tastes in SF/F works liking good SF/F works.
You say they go
by it a different manner, and you are right and it makes all the difference in the world. Duncan is much more errudite - and although Pullman's content is much more mature that most (not me) would think kids should reard due to it's YA target audience - I think we both agree Duncan's content is much more so. I can give my 4 year old Pullman's work and she could comprehend and read it just fine - I'm unsure if she could follow
Vellum (actually I'm sure she can't).
My comment
Next to No implies my recognition of what I think is a superficial similarity (that obviously I was aware of).
Anyway, it was interesting to read your review, and I wasn't surprised to see you rated Vellum so highly.
When I first got this manuscript (I think in June/July) - I was really astounded. I have noted this before but this is a book that 80% of genre fans will not appreciate at all - but the minority that does will make sure it's nominated for all the genre recognition. There are not many debut novels this audacious. At this point, even after reading Crowley's
Lord Byron novel, and recognizing how good Tamar Yellin's
Genizah at the House of Shepher was - at this point it's the best SF/F novel I have read published in 2005
Anyways - thanks for the comments. Always welcome.