Probably. There's an Andy Clutterbuck in the book too, and I seem to remember that name from something else of King's that I've read, although I couldn't tell you what.
I started the book on Saturday and will try to review it properly once I'm finished, but initial thoughts are that the opening is a rambling mess. But it eventually gives way to something coherent around the 150 page mark and has been plodding along okay since.
The title of the novel,
Lisey's Story, seems to be a bit of a misnomer given that she doesn't appear to have a story. I do note that the third part shares the name of the novel, so I'll reserve judgement there. The language is really annoying and repetitive. An editor could have cut through the majority of it with his red pen and probably produced a better narrative. It's also rife with annoying transliterations of accents (if anyone can tell me what 'a puff-ickly huy-yuge batch of orifice' is supposed to mean...perfectly huge
something...then let me know). I don't mind an author using a phrase I don't understand in the book as the context may explain it or I'm not meant to know just yet, but King is putting these words and phrases in Lisey's head - surely she doesn't occasionally think in all manner of accents. Another page expander happens to be the annoying habit of using 'as so-and-so would say' and 'what so-and-so would call a' with regards to almost every phrase in the book. And then there's the word
smucking.
There's much made of the derivation of the word, being from boo, book, and clue. As far as I can tell it's derived from bollocks. It doesn't make sense, no matter how much King has tried to explain it, and it makes every character that uses it appear childish. It's more than a stretch: I think King has snapped.