Robert
Active Member
I allready knew the song Robert ,didn't click on it, just wanted to remind you about it again.
Yeah, thanks a lot. Now everytime I see you using that whistling smilie I'll remember the song. :lol:
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
I allready knew the song Robert ,didn't click on it, just wanted to remind you about it again.
yeah, thanks a lot. Now everytime i see you using that whistling smilie i'll remember the song. :lol:
I think people spend as much or as little time on the forum as their schedule allows. By taking suggestions from those that post the most, I feel we would be penalizing new members or those that don't have as much time to spend on the board.
The users' activity shaw be measured not by the number of minutes or hours on line, but by the recent posts and/or by recent logins. Example: an user that logged in in the last two days may be taken as more active than an user that logged by the last time three days ago.
And also, once inserted in a list, an user may not be part of the list of the next book of the month so there will be more chances to others be inserted in this list next time.
It's just a suggestion, I don't intent to present a perfect voting system.
I myself don't spend more than 10 minutes on line. I just log in, check if there's anything new, post something (or not) and log out. I bet the same applies to anyone in here as it may happen in any forum in the internet.
In this case, you might want to suggest non-fiction for December or January.
What a good idea Robert! (sorry, just saw the post)
Are you feeling alright? You're usually a step or two ahead of me?
The best thing to do is suggest the category that you want to read for a given month. If we haven't touched on it lately, then there a very good chance everybody will buy in and put suggestions on the table for discussion. That's how we decided to read a woman author in November. In this case, you might want to suggest non-fiction for December or January.
Just a suggestion that was previously discussed.:
We discuss the book by chapters, that way one person who is finished with the book, does not go too far ahead of the rest that are in the process.I think it will also generate more talk.
Great suggestion! I see that we have two extremes going on right now. I like to examine almost each and every paragraph and ruminate on what the most minute action or line might have meant. Some other folks are like that too and then there are those who post something along the lines of: "Read it last year, loved it." Perhaps there needs to be more of a middle ground, but having read our BOTM selection a year ago or so, I can't say that I blame folks who post about reading it and having liked it. It is tough to get back into it, let alone put down other books and not be bored with the pick. We almost need a "super majority" in order to approve a book. I'm not seeing much enthusiasm for what is picked.:sad:
Makes sense to me. For example, if the current BOTM is forty chapters, state in the first post, that you will read/discuss chapters 1 to 10 on days one to seven, 11 to 20 on days 8 to 14 and so forth.We discuss the book by chapters...
Makes sense to me. For example, if the current BOTM is forty chapters, state in the first post, that you will read/discuss chapters 1 to 10 on days one to seven, 11 to 20 on days 8 to 14 and so forth.
You may need to make variations on this according to the structure of the book.
IMO, one suggestion per member would be too stifling. Better to have a rule that says at least one other member needs to bless the nomination before it goes on the voting list. If you end up with a list of more than five and none get a majority of the votes, have a run-off.
IMO, one suggestion per member would be too stifling. Better to have a rule that says at least one other member needs to bless the nomination before it goes on the voting list. If you end up with a list of more than five and none get a majority of the votes, have a run-off.