OK, all, I'll ask the dumb question. But, is the US the only country in the world where citizens and school boards seek to control the reading available to the children under their jurisdiction?
You mean as opposed to governments?
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
OK, all, I'll ask the dumb question. But, is the US the only country in the world where citizens and school boards seek to control the reading available to the children under their jurisdiction?
I don't know the answer to your question, but I can take a stab at why you see this so often in the US. We elect our school boards and have the right to speak up if we disapprove of something involving our tax dollars and our kids. While I don't believe in book banning, I can certainly understand how parents can get upset when they hear about a controversial book being 'forced' upon their children. If said parents are unfamiliar with the book and have a general distrust of teachers and school boards, then they might just get upset enough to take matters into their own hands. I know enough parents who DID try to work with teachers, principals, and school board members to settle disputes over books and programs... and who ultimately pulled their kids out of public schools and chose to home educate rather than trust their kids' education to people who seemed indifferent to their concerns. We DO have the right to voice concerns over what students are taught in public schools.OK, all, I'll ask the dumb question. But, is the US the only country in the world where citizens and school boards seek to control the reading available to the children under their jurisdiction?
OK, all, I'll ask the dumb question. But, is the US the only country in the world where citizens and school boards seek to control the reading available to the children under their jurisdiction?
You mean as opposed to governments?
Any lawyers around are free to answer.
OK, so IANAL so I asked some lawyers.
All asked said yes because "actions taken by a public school board that operates a budget funded by tax dollars constitutes a state actor".
School board meetings are open to the public so we can see how our tax dollars are being spent and it's easy to get on the docket to address a meeting. They DO limit your speaking time and ask to know what points you will be addressing.
Ummm, OK.
What does that have to do with whether or not the school board can be considered a government or not? Town halls have public meetings too.
But these people coming to air their grievances aren't the school board. They weren't elected or selected. They just showed up.
Hihi ABC, you made Sparky give up. *high five*
Hihi ABC, you made Sparky give up. *high five*
I realized that we weren't talking about the same thing.
...Yeah, because that's the sort of tolerant, open-minded guy you want deciding what teenagers should read.Fox News interviewed Peter Sprigg of Christian organisation the Family Research Council, and author of Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges Are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage, about the controversy. "Here we see the intersection of parental values being offended, the hypersexualisation of our youth and the homosexual agenda being pushed. This just illustrates why a lot of American parents are not willing to entrust their children to the public schools any more," he said.