• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

The word "****" on a t-shirt - freedom of speech?

Motokid said:
Recently, in America, a woman was kicked off a commercial airplane flight for wearing a t-shirt with a profanity on it. The shirt said "Meet The Fuckers" which was a play on words for the hit movie "Meet The Fockers", and under the title was a picture of President Bush, Vice P. Dick C., and Condie Rice.

The lady was asked to either cover the t-shirt, or turn it inside out, or remove it, or leave the plane. The lady decided to make a statement about freedom of speech, and freedom of expression, so she chose to leave the plane. Of coarse, this being America, she is now considering legal action against the airline. The airline is stating that regardless of the targeting of the Pres and Vice-Pres....it's the word "****" that was the problem.

Should anybody be able to wear clothing that displays "offensive" language anywhere they wish...or is there a time when businesses have to right to refuse service for wearing such clothing?

Where, in public is it acceptable to wear a piece of clothing with the word "****" prominantly displayed?

Is the word "****" covered by freedom of speech when printed on a t-shirt?


What's your view?
 
I have no problem with the airline refusing to condone the offensive shirt. By the way, I happen to agree with the message of the shirt.
So, because we have freedom of speech, does that mean that EVERYTHING must be allowed? I'm excluding the fire in a movie theather example. That well known exception to freedom of speech is perfectly reasonable - it's a public safety issue as Peder pointed out. Also, you can be prosecuted or at least sued for slander. So let's exclude that from the discussion too.
Now, should someone be allowed to have ANYTHING written on a T-Shirt? How about DEATH TO ALL ***** (fill in the most offensive term for the race of your choice).
How about an image of Hitler, complete with swastikas? How about pornographic pictures? How about a picture of someone being murdered or tortured - even if the picture is an actor and the depiction is faked?
None of these really threaten public safety or slander any specific person. But I would not allow them if it were my airline, restaurant, or whatever.
No, I think lines have to be drawn. Who draws them? Thats a good question. The person in charge at the time. If that person makes the wrong call too often, you get someone else.
 
The first amendment applies to government, not private business. The lady is free to pick and choose a service that will allow her to wear that shirt. No business has to guarantee you service.
 
Motokid said:
Of coarse, this being America, she is now considering legal action against the airline. The airline is stating that regardless of the targeting of the Pres and Vice-Pres....it's the word "****" that was the problem.QUOTE]
Motokid said:
As a card-carrying member of the ACLU, I am (literally) putting my money on the assertion that she does have the right to wear that shirt.

(It's kind of amusing that "Meet the Fockers" was obviously a play on the words that she was wearing on her shirt -- making it a kind of a Catch-22
t-shirt.) If she had taken a pen and closed in the top half of the 'U', I wonder if they would have then let her get on the plane?

Hm.
 
Libre, while I agree with you that lines have to be drawn somewhere, what I noticed in this was that it was not the slander against the President they banned, it was specifically the word '****'. Now, as much as I disapprove of using that word in daily speech I must accept that it has become a part of normal everyday language for many people (perhaps even a majority?) so much so that movie titles can be puns relating to that word.

Your other examples of shirt prints: yes, I would accept them all, as such I really can't think of anything I wouldn't allow on a t-shirt. One of my friends has a print of a skinned rabbit on a shirt, looks macabre and horrid, but I really don't think there's any harm in it.

Generally/ @ topic

If it is only the word '****' they had a problem with they should be consistent and close the mouths of all those passengers who might have the audacity to use that word, plus they should put up a sign: No swearing allowed. Mainly I don't think it's fair of them to ban the word **** if they hadn't written that previously in the agreement every passenger 'signs' when buying a ticket. when I order a trip, I'd certainly like to know what I can and cannot wear, so this banning of a shirt without previous warning does not sound good to me.

It's against the rules to smoke on many airlines - if people smoke anyway, there's a reason to tell them to change their behaviour, I really doubt any airlines have a specific ban on the use of the word ****, so if they want to ban it they should do so in their rules. If the woman was not in any other way inciting riots or making trouble I see no reason to ban a silly t-shirt.

For some reason I sit here with the feeling that it was a grumpy old 'Mrs. Poulteney' who took offense and complained when she briefly saw the woman pass her in the aisle, but I could be wrong.
 
I am a mother of a 15 year old so I understand about what children see and explanations, etc. I couldn't care less if the woman had that on her shirt. Buffering kids from '****' on a t-shirt and allowing them to see anything having to do with dead people, war, etc.... which would you choose? You can explain that t-shirt away with politics.

"Honey, sometimes there are people in the givernment who are nasty, mean, stupid, evil, etc....."
 
SFG75 said:
The first amendment applies to government, not private business. The lady is free to pick and choose a service that will allow her to wear that shirt. No business has to guarantee you service.
SFG has a good point here. I've seen signs in businesses that state that they reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.
 
Geenh said:
I am a mother of a 15 year old so I understand about what children see and explanations, etc. I couldn't care less if the woman had that on her shirt. Buffering kids from '****' on a t-shirt and allowing them to see anything having to do with dead people, war, etc.... which would you choose? You can explain that t-shirt away with politics.

"Honey, sometimes there are people in the givernment who are nasty, mean, stupid, evil, etc....."

I saw a truck with a bumper sticker on it that said "I (heart) GITMO" the other day. Should they be allowed to park in the airport's parking lot?

(I don't know why I picked on you to ask, Geenh!)
 
cajunmama said:
SFG has a good point here. I've seen signs in businesses that state that they reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason at any time.
Cajunmama,
Since the discussion is going in that direction, I'll offer the opinion that that sign is certainly the way it used to be. Nowadays however, in the US, I believe Federal Law governing companies that deal with the public at large, prohibits denying service to anyone on the basis of race, national origin, gender, probably religion, and possibly also gender preference. So if a business wishes to not deal with someone in one of those listed categories then they better have a good and different reason for not doing so. Or else they are up against a lawsuit --and maybe even one anyway. A real Federal Case, as we used to call it.

And if the airlaines receive Federal money, which I think they do, then they automatically have to follow Federal law.

But 4-letter words on T-shirts I'm pretty certain are not one of the listed categories, unless someone might bring a denial-of-civil-rights complaint, or a denial-of-equal-protection complaint.

And I'm not even a lawyer. Think of the number of reasons a good lawyer could think up!

Any lawyers here?

Cheers! :)
Peder
 
Peder said:
Oh well. Just lost a post, even though the thread header says it is here. :confused:

Oh well, scratch the previous. But, wow, that post took a while turning up!
 
The very cute Playboy logo represents a very large pornographic industry. The logo appears on young childrens clothes and other childrens fashion items. So children are walking advertisments for the Playboy industry, all be it subliminal advertising.
 
So now take that lady off the airplane and drop her into the middle of Disney World.....is that still ok?

How about on the kids television show Sesame Street?
 
Where a t-shirt or whatever (as long as it's not indecent exposure -'coz there are specific laws on that) with whatever the f--- you want on it and wherever you want... freedom of speech man. :p
 
Speaking of the Vice Prez and the word "****" didn't he not too long ago say that exact word when he was being interviewed when he was visiting the Gulf region?

I say let her on the plane and they can deal with it....

Where can I get that T Shirt?? :D

I have a T Shirt that says; "There's a Village in Texas that missings it's Idiot" AND a Bumper Sticker on my car that says "My Italian Greyhounds are smarter then George Bush" (It's my passive aggressive side of me)

(Now you all know were I stand on issues):p
 
LOL!
Isabell said:
Speaking of the Vice Prez and the word "****" didn't he not too long ago say that exact word when he was being interviewed when he was visiting the Gulf region?
Yes ma'am... something like, "[f---] yourself" :eek: ...
 
Isabell said:
I have a T Shirt that says; "There's a Village in Texas that missings it's Idiot"
Now, THAT's an offensive T Shirt! Have you no respect for the idiots of the world?
 
Back
Top