Bob Magness
Member
I’m still trying to get a feel for the way this place works. I have participated in a couple message boards over the years and even moderated for a time at a fairly sizeable one. At all of those boards thread necromancy was frowned upon. They didn’t want you resurrecting old threads. In general, if the thread hadn’t been posted in for over 6 months it was worth you starting a new thread.
But the nature of this board would suggest thread necromancy is not a bad thing. It may even be a positive thing. After all, the content of a particular book isn’t likely to change over the years.
The reason I am bringing this up is I just finished a book and wanted to discuss it a bit here. I did a search and found a thread dedicated to this particular book with about a dozen posts in it. But the last post in it was made about 2 years ago. Is it better to start a new thread or is it better to keep the discussion within that one thread, even if there is a two year gap between my post and the previous one?
What is the common practice here at BAR?
But the nature of this board would suggest thread necromancy is not a bad thing. It may even be a positive thing. After all, the content of a particular book isn’t likely to change over the years.
The reason I am bringing this up is I just finished a book and wanted to discuss it a bit here. I did a search and found a thread dedicated to this particular book with about a dozen posts in it. But the last post in it was made about 2 years ago. Is it better to start a new thread or is it better to keep the discussion within that one thread, even if there is a two year gap between my post and the previous one?
What is the common practice here at BAR?