joderu95
New Member
Yes, How do you measure talent?
Apparently using Isabell's eyes. nyuck,nyuck,nyuck
I know talent when I see it and also notice bands with zero talent.
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
Yes, How do you measure talent?
I know talent when I see it and also notice bands with zero talent.
So how do you measure talent?
Talent is very objective, but you have to understand music. You can qualify what is and is not a good voice and what is and is not a good musician. I realize that some people will cry no talent if they don't like the music, and that's wrong. Take the Eagles for instance. Here’s a band with 5 Grammy’s and are member of the rock and roll hof. Glenn Frey, Don Felder, Bernie Leadon, Randy Meisner, and Don Hanley are still some of the best in the business.
Would you say Pavarotti wasn’t talented?
Neil Diamond was one of the most successful singer/songwriters of all time. It might be easy to get a few songs on the charts with little to no talent, but you don’t earn 39 gold, 20 platinum, and 11 multi-platinum records without talent.
I can take of leave the Doors, but there is no way that I could ever say that lacked of talent, at least not with a straight face.
By the way, Journey has 12 gold 10 platinum and 8 multi-platinum records.
Qualify, yes. To return to my question, how do you quantify it? If talent is objective and one artist can be objectively said to have more of it than another, then it can be measured. How?Talent is very objective, but you have to understand music. You can qualify what is and is not a good voice and what is and is not a good musician.
That's "Henley". And how exactly are they still some of the best in the business? I'd argue that it takes more than one well-promoted reunion tour - those always sell out.Take the Eagles for instance. Here’s a band with 5 Grammy’s and are member of the rock and roll hof. Glenn Frey, Don Felder, Bernie Leadon, Randy Meisner, and Don Hanley are still some of the best in the business.
I wouldn't. I'm not claiming that there's no such thing as talent, I simply asked how you can tell who has more of it. Was Pavarotti more or less talented than Jussi Björling or Caruso, and by how much?Would you say Pavarotti wasn’t talented?
If Neil Diamond has, then obviously you do. Seriously though, are you arguing that talent can be measured by the number of records one sells?Neil Diamond was one of the most successful singer/songwriters of all time. It might be easy to get a few songs on the charts with little to no talent, but you don’t earn 39 gold, 20 platinum, and 11 multi-platinum records without talent.
...I guess you are.By the way, Journey has 12 gold 10 platinum and 8 multi-platinum records.
By the way, Journey has 12 gold 10 platinum and 8 multi-platinum records.
No way! Take That were, and still are, fantastic.Every boy band that has ever existed.
Overrated Bands:
The Beatles
The Ramones
:jawdrop:
Led Zeppelin
Pink Floyd
The Rolling Stones
The Doors
The Ramones
I went into those artists when I was younger believing they would be the best thing imaginable for music. They weren't, but I was in some sort of thought process that all good music was that of classic rock... when in reality, in my perspective, 99% of classic rock is just as lame as the music on the radio today.
To redeem myself, I listen to much avant-garde (Rock In Opposition being a particular favorite "genre"), classical (of all forms), certain metal (not the cheesiness that sits on most of the genre, I listen to mainly metal of the experimental persuasion), pop, jazz, electronic music (glitch and sample-based music being my favorite niche), ambient, etc.
GOOD classic music, in my opinion, consists of work by Frank Zappa, Captain Beefheart, Coltrane, Igor Stravinsky, Miles Davis, Sun Ra, Theloneous Monk, among others.