Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Welcome
to BookAndReader!
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences
along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site
is free and easy, just CLICK
HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click
here.
This is a tough question, they are both incredibly awful on almost every level. If I had to choose I'd go with Feist but it's like picking whether to shoot myself in either my left or right..well you get the point.
I didn't think Feist's Magician was that bad. Sure, it was very flawed, it wasn't entirely original, but it had some good parts and I think it's clear he's more original than Brooks (the Kelewan part at least). Perhaps I was just lucky to read Feist as one of the first fantasy authors I read, but I remember him being distinctly better than Eddings, and IMO he's at least an equal to Jordan at his best with Magician. Of course, Magician is his best novel.
For the page boy turned most powerful wizard/warrior/choose your archtype cliche, Feist pretty much does it best. i would go with Feist's riftwar saga and just keep reading them all, up to conclave of shadows then stop lol cause the conclave series is stupid.