Will
Active Member
I think I love King's work as he writes about 'humans', groups, communities, small societies, hell, even large ones, so very, very well. I do find that his descriptive details can be tiresome at times, but generally add to things. This varies lots between works. When I think to a novel of his, lets say The Gunslinger, his descriptions are far tighter, far more effective, than in say Bag of Bones where they can become a burden to the general flow of the prose.