mehastings
Active Member
I went to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory last night. I have read the book and I thought that this adaptation was much closer to what I pictured. It was absolutely a typical Tim Burton and Johhny Depp movie. I think the most descriptive comparison would be to say that it was like Edward Scissorhands meets a nice LSD trip.
I really didn't see the reason behind the whole father plotline or the ending though. The ending just seemed overly apeasing and forced. I think the ending as the book has it, would have been better.
I think that a lot of people will like the original movie better because it is old and familiar. If you've seen the movie a dozen times and haven't read the book, the only picture you have in your head of Willy Wonka is of Gene Wilder. I went to see it with a friend who thought it was "weird" and "creepy" until I told her I liked it and why. Then, it became "weird and creepy in a good way".
I really didn't see the reason behind the whole father plotline or the ending though. The ending just seemed overly apeasing and forced. I think the ending as the book has it, would have been better.
I think that a lot of people will like the original movie better because it is old and familiar. If you've seen the movie a dozen times and haven't read the book, the only picture you have in your head of Willy Wonka is of Gene Wilder. I went to see it with a friend who thought it was "weird" and "creepy" until I told her I liked it and why. Then, it became "weird and creepy in a good way".