BobbyBurns:
Who were the merovingians?
The Merovingians are considered to have been the first ruling family in France. Although the first well-known Merovingian was Clovis, the family name derives from his dimly known ancestor, Merovee. As best we can figure out, Merovee was a Frankish leader during the first half of the fifth century, but, at that time, only one of many such warrior leaders.
The area that would become France was in something of a mess for much of the fifth and even the sixth centuries, as various groups struggled for geographical and political gain. It was largely thanks to Clovis (c. 466-511) that the chaos was at least somewhat suppressed, since that military ruler managed both to conquer most of his important opponents and to curry the favor of the Church. By the time of his death, a chunk of territory primarily in the center, east, and north of present-day France had been brought under tenuous control by the Merovingians.
However, most of the rules and precedents that would later lend some degree of permanent stability to the monarchy were still very much in flux at that point. Since the custom of primogeniture had not yet been established, Clovis, who produced four sons, divided his territory among them. This division led not only to conflict among his heirs but also to the beginnings of what might be called a "German" part of the Merovingian holdings versus a "Gallo-Roman" part.
Luckily one of Clovis’ heirs managed to reunite the territory, but the residue of a rivalry between the areas then known as Neustrie to the west and Austrasie to the east remained to create problems. In the sixth century, the rivalry produced a shocking scandal during the reign of Sigebert I of Austrasie, when there was a struggle between Brunehaut, his wife , and Frédégonde, the wife of the ruler of Neustrie—but that is a story for another day.
The Merovingians never really succeeded in a permanent unification effort, and by the seventh century they were in decline. They faced the rising power of their nobles, along with the distressing repetitive pattern of minor rulers who died leaving behind minor heirs. Historically, dynasties that produce only minors to inherit the throne are setting themselves up for trouble. There are always court rivalries over the control of the young king and, in addition, enemies within and without regard a period of minority as the ideal time to take over the country.
In addition to their problems with minorities, these so-called Merovingian rois fainéants faced a formidable series of rivals waiting in the wings—the future Carolingians. Once these capable and ambitious rivals became Mayors of the Palace, they worked tirelessly to advance their power, ingratiating themselves with the Church and providing the only successful military might available. It was the Carolingian Mayor Charles Martel, of course, who defeated the invading Islamic forces at Tours in 732, leading to the recognition of his son, Pepin the Short (d. 768), as ruler instead of merely Mayor.
Putting an end to the rival Merovingians, being crowned, and starting a new royal dynasty should have come down to us as major historical accomplishments, but poor Pepin the Short has always been eclipsed in the history books by his more famous offspring, Charlemagne, who became one of the bright lights of the early Middle Ages and therefore gets most of the good press.
That's it, in a nutshell.
Were they affiliated with either the freemasons or a group called the illuminati?
The Merovingians are a part of the top bloodlines within the Illuminati; the 13th Illuminati Bloodline is known as the Merovingians. Joseph Smith, along with Hiram Smith and Brigham Young, were the key figures behind the creation of the Mormon religion. They were of the elite of the elite Illuminati bloodline, the Merovingian or "Holy Grail" line, and were all high degree Freemasons.
What's the pyramid on the back of the dollar bill for?
If you look at the left hand circle on the back of the one dollar bill, you will see a Pyramid. This pyramid was not a part of the proposals for the Great Seal until the third committee, and it was not suggested by Jefferson, Franklin, and Adams. Notice the face is lighted and the western side is dark. Although there is no "official" explanation for the shading, some interpret it as a reflection that our country was just beginning and had not begun to explore the West or decided what we could do for Western Civilization. The Pyramid is UN-capped, which may signify that our country was not yet finished. The unfinished state of the pyramid was intentional, and Charles Thompson, in his remarks to congress about the symbolism on the Great Seal, said the pyramid represented "Strength and Duration." Inside the capstone you have the all-seeing eye, and ancient symbol for divinity. Although Franklin's committee did not suggest a pyramid, it did originate the suggestion of the eye. However, the term "the all-seeing eye" was never officially used when describing it.
What makes the story interesting is that the eye and pyramid have links to Freemasonry. The eye, for example, is said to be a symbol of the Great Architect of the Universe, i.e., God. The symbolic significance of the pyramid and the eye were well known to educated folk of the 18th century, and one may argue that the Masons and the designers of the seal were merely drawing on a common fund of symbolic meaning. But what if there's more to it?
Due to incomplete records, nobody knows exactly how many of the founding fathers were Masons. But there were quite a few, including George Washington, Ben Franklin, and possibly Thomas Jefferson. Franklin and Jefferson were on the committee assigned to design the great seal. This group produced a design calling for, among other things, an all-seeing eye. While the eye was cool, the design otherwise was pretty feeble, and the job wound up getting dumped on the secretary of the Congress, Charles Thomson. Thomson enlisted the aid of Philadelphian William Barton. The two cooked up the scheme we have today, incorporating the all-seeing eye plus a pyramid, because everybody liked the idea of Egyptian symbolism.
Why are most monosyllabic words (english words) rooted in german and most polysyllabic words rooted in latin?
That I do not know. Do you?
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Told ya you'd get your answer.
NEXT!
Cheers, Martin