I have to admit Dean Koontz is the author that got me reading. But either having grown up or having gone on to read better authors I have realized he has some almost unredeamable flaws. His heroes redefine the word perfect while his villains are ridiculously evil. He knows how to complicate the hell out of a decent simple plotline. His plots take on the quality of a funhouse until the very end at which time he very disappointingly ties everything together. Finally his biggest flaw: his endings are so, nautiously, stomach churningly, I think I threw up a little in my mouth, perfectly happy that you could swear he let his twelve year old daughter finish his book for him.
Here I have written what I think is representitive of your average Koontz ending: Stan embraced Susan in the midst of the monster's melted body. Even though he had met her that morning he knew they would get married the next day. After all, they were both young billionaires, destined to live another two hundred years, without the need of sleep, or food (unless they felt like eating for fun or sleeping to kill some time). They both had the same birthdate (only a minute apart), and the exact same taste in music, books, movies, and everything else imaginable.
Here is koontz one quality: For every ten shitty books he writes he can usually crank out a gem. example: Intensity