Kenny Shovel said:
You’ll have to explain what you mean by this.
I mean that I must have missed something when they explained Present, Past etc. Perfect Tenses back in school. And as after that I have never been taught Grammar thoroughly, I am sure I misuse the Perfect Tenses. I have a general idea when to use them, but it seems that idea is mostly wrong... I have tried to read a Grammar book (I believe it is quite good - I understood some things better because of it), but I still cannot get a handle on my Perfect Tenses...
Kenny Shovel said:
Wise? Well perhaps; at times I think it is regarded more as being good manners in Britain. Many people here say that we don’t like it when others are successful, I am not so sure of that. I think it is perhaps more a case that we don’t like people to show off or be overly proud of their success, I think that humility is still considered a virtue. It is important if you have success to seem to still ‘have your feet on the ground’, if not people, and more importantly the press, can turn against you. That is probably true in all countries but in Britain perhaps more than most.
Yep. I've thought about that for some time yesterday. It must be good not to boast about one's success, especially as there are very many people around with the same or better abilities, who could not have made it. Of course it is luck and not only abilities that's needed to be successful. But it is very pleasing to oneself to think that it is all your own achievement, that you are good at what you do etc. It is also useful for "programming" oneself for future success. But of course it is easy "to loose one's ground" and feel oneself kind of superior, and that is too bad.
Yes, I have to reevaluate my own attitude...
As to not liking success of others... I think that for a normal person it is OK when others succeed. I feel no envy towards more successful people - some of them are very much more hard-working than me. It helps that I've known some of really wealthy men when they were the same as me - pennyless and without much help from parents. One of them, the founder of the first big Russian PC - oriented firm "VIST" had been my friend. Too bad he was killed 5 years ago... But when he started his business, he earned about the same as me, but while I spent all the money on clothes, trips, hobbies etc. - he and his wife had one pair of jeans each... And in a couple of years he became a millionair, and I still made enough to live comfortably (while I kept working). So I wouldn't have traded my income for that of much more wealthy people, as with that one gets much more trouble than I am ready to handle.
And, the more successful the people around me get - the more profit they could give me as my possible customers...
And I've never seen so much Rolls-Royces, Bentleys & Porches as in London. So your people are quite successful, and not excessively humble about spending their money... Am I in error? By the way, what make your sport car is?
Kenny Shovel said:
I suspect they approved more because he wrote communist propaganda during WW1 for them. He is a very intriguing character and much of his life is featured in his work. For example in “Svejk” he tells the story of a man who edits a Wildlife magazine and gets bored so he starts to invent creatures that don’t exist, and finally loses his job when he writes an advert offering “Pure bred Werewolves”; something that Hasek did in real life. I believe he had quite a few people who wanted to make such a purchase, I can’t remember if he took money from them, but I suspect he did and drank the lot! Anyway, if you can get a biography of him it is worth reading.
Wow. It seems some of the facts look familiar to me... What an interesting and reckless person he must have been...
Kenny Shovel said:
If he likes Scandinavia, you should recommend Scotland to him.
OK, I will.
Kenny Shovel said:
Britain used to be covered in forest hundreds of years ago but most has been removed to make land to live on. Of course some still exists; I drive past the edge of Sherwood forest (from the Robin Hood stories) every time I go home, although it is more of a large wood these days.
Great. It could be interesting to get a glimpse at the Sherwood forest...
You know, yesterday I went to see the HitchHikers' Guide to the Galaxy. Yeah, I liked it. But really I would have liked nearly anything in connection with works by Douglas Adams. My wife did not like it, and daughter was dubious. The hall was one-third full, and the people were not excessively enthusiastic after the film ended. I imagine that most of the audience were the people who have read the original book in English. (We have a translation into Russian, but I think that much of original humor, based sometimes on associations etc., were lost on the Russian reader, so the book was not too successful here).
It is obvious that some things are exactly what they should be, and others - nearly that. But all this adding of Trisha and Zaphod's actions, intended to give the story a boost it supposedly needed to make a good film out of a brilliant book, I think failed to achieve that.
That's kind of somebody takes a painting by... say, Gogen, - and covers 80% of it with a white paint, then addes about 5% of his own design... Result is surely not Gogen, and hardly a masterpiece...
OK, but I liked it just the same. How do you think, do they plan a sequel? the Restaurant at the End of the Universe? They would, if the HHG is a success, wouldn't they?