We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
Martin said:Guess I never got that memo.
I will savour our time together, though. We'll always have Par .. erm, that pizza place.
Cheers
Cheers... bumped.
I agree, thats one hell of a title. I'm guessing that things got added to it over the years. I can't imagine they came up with all that at once!Motokid said:That's a very good question.....thanx for askin'
answer:
Because, since I can't get away from it I might as well comment on some of it and have some fun with it at the same time. I find the full, complete name of the pope to be outrageous. Talk about a superiority complex. No true religious leader (in my mind) would accept having a title like that. It's obvious these people think themselves above the rest, and superior in all ways. I find it extremely hypocritical and laughable. So I figured I'd share what I found to be quite funny with the rest of you. I don't know anybody who knew the full title of the pope.
I like spreading news when I can. The funnier the better.
Vegas is still taking bets, but I haven't checked the line lately. Maybe I should start planting the seeds of chaos and make a few bets.Motokid said:Ritalinkid, thread lasted 24 hours and still alive....nice
Ever heard of "Papal Infallibility?Motokid said:]It's obvious these people think themselves above the rest, and superior in all ways.
I read this to say, "Through divine authority, the Pope can make no mistake in interpretation of the Bible. His authority is subject to no one, not clergy or members of the church." If that's correct, that may explain to you why he gladly accepts the title. If this is an incorrect interpretation and someone here went to Catholic school, please let me know what the correct interpretation is.The First Vatican Council has defined as "a divinely revealed dogma" that "the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra -- that is, when in the exercise of his office as pastor and teacher of all Christians he defines, by virtue of his supreme Apostolic authority, a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the whole Church -- is, by reason of the Divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, possessed of that infallibility with which the Divine Redeemer wished His Church to be endowed in defining doctrines of faith and morals; and consequently that such definitions of the Roman Pontiff are irreformable of their own nature (ex sese) and not by reason of the Church's consent" --Infallibility at the Catholic Encyclopedia [1913]
BTW, this was not meant to be bait or an attack, but I see how it could be taken that way. I should have put some smiles around it because you can't always get across the tone in your voice or the fact that you were smiling when you made a post. I hope no mods took offense. I would let you know in a much more direct manner if I had a problem.RitalinKid said:Martin is on patrol, walking his beat, just as his avatar suggests.
Martin said:Did I mention I hate smileys?
Cheers
jenngorham said:i tried to post with like 20 smilies and the forum wouldn't allow it. this is censorship. i demand an unlimited smilie quota
watercrystal said:I think 19 of them might have the similar effect. wait, doe the forum agree on that?