• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

TBF Forums

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kiyoung80

New Member
Case closed for Scott Peterson?

So far, I'm not impressed with the evidence presented by the prosecution. Yes there's plenty of circumstantial evidence, but nothing really concrete (no pun intended) to convict him of the charges. It's a shame because I do feel that he's guilty as sin, but it just seems that they let the defense have it easy. What I think would have been great to have seen would be Court TV's anchorwoman, Nancy Grace, against Scott Peterson. From what I've read, she has a perfect record of nearly 100 felony convictions at trial - and no losses while she worked as a prosecutor in Atlanta.

What does everyone here think? Do you think we'll have yet another killer walking free?

Court TV gives the most extensive trial coverage during the day, but I'm at work until 6pm usually. From what I hear though, during the closing arguments (which start on Monday, 11/1) they are going to give Nancy Grace her own 2-hour show from 6pm-8pm to review that day's events. That kind of works perfectly for me, and hopefully will give us some insite on what's going on that courtroom.

Kimberly
 
hi kimberly
first of all
welcome to the forums
i guess your thread looks intersting but since im in another country really dont have a clue about what trial are you talking about, so if you could provide a link it would be helpful
 
Kiyoung80 said:
So far, I'm not impressed with the evidence presented by the prosecution.

Firstly, what the title TBF Forums has to do with this thread I don't get.

Secondly, your post doesn't fit - by lack of details alone - the usual discussion here.

Thirdly, why am I responding to an obvious bot?

Darren, if you read this, please put character recognition into the registration process.
 
Kiyoung80 said:
So far, I'm not impressed with the evidence presented by the prosecution. Yes there's plenty of circumstantial evidence, but nothing really concrete (no pun intended) to convict him of the charges. It's a shame because I do feel that he's guilty as sin, but it just seems that they let the defense have it easy. What I think would have been great to have seen would be Court TV's anchorwoman, Nancy Grace, against Scott Peterson. From what I've read, she has a perfect record of nearly 100 felony convictions at trial - and no losses while she worked as a prosecutor in Atlanta.

What does everyone here think? Do you think we'll have yet another killer walking free?

Court TV gives the most extensive trial coverage during the day, but I'm at work until 6pm usually. From what I hear though, during the closing arguments (which start on Monday, 11/1) they are going to give Nancy Grace her own 2-hour show from 6pm-8pm to review that day's events. That kind of works perfectly for me, and hopefully will give us some insite on what's going on that courtroom.

Kimberly

Yes, I agree 100%. Four legs and two donkeys does not a pot of pie make. Good work, keep it up, carry on, don't stop. Love the shoes.
 
Abulafia said:
Your signature is just too big.

You are the first person to speak it out I appreciated that and also your attitude to yourself --" I love myself", you mentioned in one thread--- which is very positive. :) I mean, considering that there are still peoples who don't even know how.

hope it dosen't sound tobe judgemental.
 
Freya said:
Switch sigs off.

I'm not switching signatures off just because some asshole can't act sensibly. I've reported Ou Be Low hoo to the administrator - for the second time regarding signatures - as it's a blatant misuse of a privilege. Luckily, Darren can ban - should he choose - Ou Be Low hoo from having a signature at all.

Gizmo said:
I think that's what he's talking about: The Laci Peterson Case

I'd just ignore it. The thread has been started by a 'bot' with the sole attention of attracting awareness to something that we shouldn't really give a damn about. Similar ones, of late, have been chiding on about Falun Gong - as if we care. The solution is to turn on the visual identification for registrees to the forum.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top