• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

Vladimir Nabokov

Peder!
LOL The first thing I thought of was the scene in Pnin. Nabokov's wonderfully obsessive memory served him well. :)

The sounds you heard were me speeding a few feet over to the bookcase closest to the computer that holds.....yes...Nabokov. Found your quote, and read on from there. /sigh/ Young Love.

Gotta love his father. :cool:
 
pontalba said:
Found your quote, and read on from there. /sigh/ Young Love.
Gotta love his father. :cool:
Pontalba,
Yeah, young love! Sweet innit?
Also neat that his father was so well thought of.
That might not have hurt with the girls, either, being prince to the king.
As I said, just plain ordinary backgrounds to his stories. :rolleyes: Riiiiiight. :)
So, let's see. What didn't he have? :confused:
Peder
 
steffee said:
Peder, lovely avatar! :D
Steffee,
Thank you. It's been a long wait. Then suddenly there it was! Something light and airy, instead of that dark blue somber other one I had.
I like yours too. Nice cheery modern less-is-more, almost white on white.
Peder
 
Peder said:
Pontalba,
Yeah, young love! Sweet innit?
Also neat that his father was so well thought of.
That might not have hurt with the girls, either, being prince to the king.
As I said, just plain ordinary backgrounds to his stories. :rolleyes: Riiiiiight. :)
So, let's see. What didn't he have? :confused:
Peder
Um, Peder, I don't think it was a question of prince to the king here, have you looked at the pictures of Nabokov? Not a bad lookin' fella. :rolleyes:

Plus he had IT. ;)
 
pontalba said:
Um, Peder, I don't think it was a question of prince to the king here, have you looked at the pictures of Nabokov? Not a bad lookin' fella. :rolleyes:

Plus he had IT. ;)
Pontalba,
All very true. But I'll bet there also weren't any mothers telling their daughters not to go out with him, wait for someone better. :rolleyes:
I bet when his parents held a reception there wasn't a single daughter left home alone. Sons, feh! But daughters, you are coming whether you like it or not, so get dressed! And I mean really dressed! And remember. Smile!

/cynical to the core/ :cool:
Peder
 
Peder said:
Pontalba,
All very true. But I'll bet there also weren't any mothers telling their daughters not to go out with him, wait for someone better. :rolleyes:
I bet when his parents held a reception there wasn't a single daughter left home alone. Sons, feh! But daughters, you are coming whether you like it or not, so get dressed! And I mean really dressed! And remember. Smile!

/cynical to the core/ :cool:
Peder
Yeah, but I'd make book that the gals were not dragging their lil ole heels one teeny, tiny bit either. ;)
 
Well, Still,
Does that all make you feel any better about all the girl problems poor worn out VN had to put up with? :cool: :rolleyes:
Peder
 
Peder said:
Well, Still,
Does that all make you feel any better about all the girl problems poor worn out VN had to put up with? :cool: :rolleyes:
Peder

Poor worn out VN? What about poor young Martin? He's been a pretty busy teenager so far. A girl named Bess just helped herself to ten of his pounds (I wonder how much that amounted to back then?); Martin seems to have thought it a fair trade at any rate, as he went straight out and climbed a lampost. ;)
 
Still
It does seem a little odd to hear VN praise Martin Edelweiss so highly in the Introduction as one of his characters, and then see the unconventional and naive ways that Martin behaves in the story. I'm still thinking that over.
But it sounds like you are making great progress. YAY! :)
Peder
 
Glory.jpg


Libra's kindly contributions lead me to find this on the web. It's a sample of what Podvig looked like when she was still in the works:
 
As mentioned in the Lolita thread, I purchased B.R. Meyrs' A Readers Manifesto after noticing in an amazon review that Myers was reported to regard Nabokov favorably. I had hopes of finding selections in the book from VN's works and I thought it would be interesting to see what they were and what Myers said about them. Disappointingly, they are only extremely brief allusions. The first allusion, to Lolita, has already been mentioned in that thread. The next two occur briefly in a single paragraph
Today's Serious Writers ... subject us to the least expressive sentences in the history of the American novel. When Don DeLillo describes a man's walk as "a sort of explanatory shuffle, a comment on the literature of shuffles"(178) I feel nothing; the wordplay is just too insincere, too patently meaningless. But when Nabokov talks of "midges continuously darning the air in one spot," (179) or the "square echo"(180) of a car door slamming, I feel what Philip Larking hoped that readers of his poetry would feel: "Yes! I've never thought of it that way. But that's how it is."(181)
A Reader's Manifesto - B.R. Myers​

178. DeLillo, Underworld p188
179. Vladimir Nabokov, Laughter in the Dark p16
180. Vladimir Nabokov, Bend Sinister p60
181. Philip Larkin, "An Interview with the Observer," Required Writing p56
The final mention of Nabokov is simply:
As Nabokov pointed out in criticizing Dostoevsky's vague references to his characters' past sins, "art is always specific." (231) Literature need not answer every question that it raises, but the questions themselves should be clear.
A Reader's Manifesto - B.R. Myers​
231. Vladimir Nabokov, Lectures on Russian Literature p117
So that's the extent of Nabokov's writings, among other authors', which are used as standards against which other writers are judged.

The subtitle to the Myers' book is An Attack on the Growing Pretentiousness in American Literary Prose. And as these excerpts suggest, the major part of the text is devoted to dissecting examples of the writing of five well-reviewed and highly honored current authors (and their favorable reviewers) whom he believes all exemplify the pretentiousness of the subtitle: Paul Auster, DonDeLillo, David Guterson, Cormac McCarthy and Annie Proulx. The book concludes with Myers' defense against critics who think he has been too harsh, or simply wrong.

Peder
 
StillILearn said:
Looks as if this took place before he began working on the 3 x 5 index cards.
Perhaps so, however could be that he first, as an extremely rough, rough draft used the 3x5s and then went on to the typewritten pages as you show them. Remember how Vera had to type and retype? Never ending. All that with no word processor of any sort. :eek: :cool: :rolleyes:
 
Peder Great summary of what little of Nabokov that was there. I'm very glad that Myers didn't think our VN pretentious. Them would be fightin' words!
"midges continuously darning the air in one spot,"
How marvelous!
:D
:cool:
 
pontalba said:
Peder .... I'm very glad that Myers didn't think our VN pretentious. Them would be fightin' words!
Pontalba,
Interesting that you should mention.
I don't remember that the critics and reviewers who challenged Myers suggested that there were any other authors he should also have ctiticized, old or new. They mainly rejected his understanding of modern-day creative literature and/or his credentials for having any such opinions in the first place. Some were simply dismissive and condescending, saying that periodically there are such ill-informed nay-sayers out there. He, however, stood his ground and also pointed to a large amount of favorable response that he said his ideas had received. I don't have a dog in that fight, but his criticisms seemed to be well taken in terms of the selections of writing that he used -- the same selections that reviewers (whom he thought were deluded) had praised very highly. It is a slim book and whether or not he proved his main point -- that the quality of writing in novels has declined overall -- is probably still arguable. But some of his comments were so out-loud hilarious they had me laughing in the coffee shop. Nevertheless, were it not for the exaggerated mention of Nabokov that I read in a review, I'm not sure it is a book I would have run right out and bought, especially since I haven't read any of the current authors he criticizes.
Peder
 
Greetings Fellow Nabokovians and of course wannabe Nabokovians!. It is morning here, bright sunshine is streaming in my window, and it bodes to be a beautiful day. A wonderful day to sit in the backyard and finish (hopefully) a Gloryious book. :D

You know who you are! LOL :D ;) :cool:

Back later after tea. :eek:
 
Back
Top