Well, I don’t consider the “elbow bone” thing as a flaw, just stupid.
Bad writing, not being able to turn one bloody metaphor, a witnessing-narrator telling us what people “think” (that’s impossible, kids) among other things *is* error.
As for snakes’ eyes, well, I’m not going to cap on some dimwit typist who writes about creatures and wizards and other nonsense for not knowing some basic biology…
Ah, the Madness of Crowds. The non-point to words like “love”. The theory that if that same world-wide crowd states 2 + 2 = 5, then it will then indeed be 5…
That said, the combination of your user name and avatar makes me chuckle…
Happy reading,
j
Bad writing, not being able to turn one bloody metaphor, a witnessing-narrator telling us what people “think” (that’s impossible, kids) among other things *is* error.
As for snakes’ eyes, well, I’m not going to cap on some dimwit typist who writes about creatures and wizards and other nonsense for not knowing some basic biology…
MonkeyCatcher said:yet this book is still loved world-wide.
Ah, the Madness of Crowds. The non-point to words like “love”. The theory that if that same world-wide crowd states 2 + 2 = 5, then it will then indeed be 5…
That said, the combination of your user name and avatar makes me chuckle…
Happy reading,
j