novella said:
jay, you clearly aren't QUOTING me here
You are correct and get half-points for observance: note the inverted commas, *not* quotations marks.
I'm pretty specific in pointing out the areas in which I think Murakami substantively fails.
You are, which is appreciated. I’m not sure how or why you decided to finally pick up HM, but it does generally seem that many people go into him knowing to except something a bit…different.
No reason for you to be disappointed.
Don’t take it (or anything) too personal, just as I am puzzled when shite books are celebrated, I am dismayed when good books are not appreciated.
I try not to lose any sleep over it though.
What would you say, then, that Murakami is trying to achieve, particularly given that he is, himself, resistant to discussing that subject and similarly resistant to analysis of his work? I'm judging his 'achievement' (i.e., lack thereof) based on the two most important aspects of any novel, in my view.
In my view, he was trying to achieve telling story in a specific way.
Which he succeeded at.
It really needs no analysis, further embellishing or ‘answers’.
I’ve always been a bit fond of Mark Twain’s “notice” in the front of _Huckleberry Finn_:
“PERSONS attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted;
persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons
attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.”
I appreciate your views and I _do_ understand them.
If you said these things about nearly any other writer I’d be right there backing you up.
But as some of these traits are heavily a part of HM’s writing, based on this (having read everything by HM available in English) I have to claim it 1) works (for a specific reader) and 2) that if it didn’t work for you, then I sincerely believe ‘Wind-Up Bird’, while a more expansive novel, more than likely will not be an overly enjoyable read for you.
(And why are you so coyly directing this at some imagined audience rather than at me?)
You claim to note what is “typical” of me but can’t pick up on the fact that I do this in every one of my posts? Very rarely am I directing words at a specific person, and when I do I generally writer his/her name.
Public board, public posts.
While I can’t claim to have some “imagined audience”, I probably wouldn’t waste so much time if I thought I just had an audience of one.
I _do_ have a Mussolini complex to uphold…
j