readingomnivore
Well-Known Member
Charlie Roxburgh’s THE CASE OF THE RUSSIAN CHESSBOARD is a novella published in e-book format in 2011. It is another “suppressed story” in the post-Doyle Sherlock Holmes sub-genre of mysteries.
Sherlock Holmes is visited by young Victoria Simmonds, who seeks his help in rescuing her younger sister Angela from Liberty House, a commune of Russian exiles and revolutionaries in Camden Town. A young Russian woman Sophia, who’d lived there, has just committed suicide by throwing herself under a train, and Angela has told her sister that she’s moving into Liberty House to stay, that Victoria is no longer to try to contact her. Both women are influenced by Anna Perovskaya, a dedicated anti-Czarist. Liberty House falls under the influence of Russian nihilist Pyotr Bogdanovich, who advocates terror and extreme violence against British targets. Up and coming young British politician Malcolm Pryde-Anderson offers Holmes’s aid to Colonel Volkshovsky and Major Alexandrov of the Okhrana, the Czarist secret police, as a quid pro quo for their techniques for manipulating and controlling the revolutionaries. Pryde-Anderson anticipates using them against political opposition and labor unions in Great Britain. Can Holmes rescue Angela without becoming involved with Okhrana?
In the modern world political climate, it’s instructional to remember that this is not the first time terrorism has been as an instrument of policy. Involving Holmes in a novella involving the Russian revolutionaries, anarchists, and nihilists of various persuasions should be intriguing. Unfortunately, THE CASE OF THE RUSSIAN CHESSBOARD is not.
***POSSIBLE SPOILERS***
Roxburgh shows little direct action, reporting only the assassination of Pyotr Bogdnovich as happening in Holmes and Watson’s presence. Everything else that occurs is told to them in huge, almost dramatic monologue speeches. We’re told that Holmes is investigating, that’s he’s observing Liberty House, but we see nothing of his activity. Double and triple crosses make it difficult to understand who’s doing what to whom, and why.
There’s little characterization, even of Holmes and Watson; the Russian characters are all poorly developed stereotypes. I do enjoy Watson’s take on Society of Friends of Russian Freedom, which supports Liberty House: “At these meetings there were exiled Russian nihilists, rich English liberals who sympathised with the underdog anywhere but home, English Socialists, bluestocking feminists and would-be poets and bohemians of all nationalities--and various Italian and Spanish anarchists on the run from their own governments. From the Society of Friends of Russian Freedom there seemed to spread out all sorts of study groups, reading circles, tea-parties and soirees for intellectuals in Hampstead and Chiswick and goodness knows what else. To my grumpy mind they sounded like an audience excitedly following revolutionary dramas from their own perfectly safe seats in the theatre of life.”
Setting is established only by street names and London suburbs. Roxburgh makes some attempt at Conan Doyle’s style of writing, but modern expressions slip through. The story has good potential, but it needs thorough revision. Not recommended. (D)
Sherlock Holmes is visited by young Victoria Simmonds, who seeks his help in rescuing her younger sister Angela from Liberty House, a commune of Russian exiles and revolutionaries in Camden Town. A young Russian woman Sophia, who’d lived there, has just committed suicide by throwing herself under a train, and Angela has told her sister that she’s moving into Liberty House to stay, that Victoria is no longer to try to contact her. Both women are influenced by Anna Perovskaya, a dedicated anti-Czarist. Liberty House falls under the influence of Russian nihilist Pyotr Bogdanovich, who advocates terror and extreme violence against British targets. Up and coming young British politician Malcolm Pryde-Anderson offers Holmes’s aid to Colonel Volkshovsky and Major Alexandrov of the Okhrana, the Czarist secret police, as a quid pro quo for their techniques for manipulating and controlling the revolutionaries. Pryde-Anderson anticipates using them against political opposition and labor unions in Great Britain. Can Holmes rescue Angela without becoming involved with Okhrana?
In the modern world political climate, it’s instructional to remember that this is not the first time terrorism has been as an instrument of policy. Involving Holmes in a novella involving the Russian revolutionaries, anarchists, and nihilists of various persuasions should be intriguing. Unfortunately, THE CASE OF THE RUSSIAN CHESSBOARD is not.
***POSSIBLE SPOILERS***
Roxburgh shows little direct action, reporting only the assassination of Pyotr Bogdnovich as happening in Holmes and Watson’s presence. Everything else that occurs is told to them in huge, almost dramatic monologue speeches. We’re told that Holmes is investigating, that’s he’s observing Liberty House, but we see nothing of his activity. Double and triple crosses make it difficult to understand who’s doing what to whom, and why.
There’s little characterization, even of Holmes and Watson; the Russian characters are all poorly developed stereotypes. I do enjoy Watson’s take on Society of Friends of Russian Freedom, which supports Liberty House: “At these meetings there were exiled Russian nihilists, rich English liberals who sympathised with the underdog anywhere but home, English Socialists, bluestocking feminists and would-be poets and bohemians of all nationalities--and various Italian and Spanish anarchists on the run from their own governments. From the Society of Friends of Russian Freedom there seemed to spread out all sorts of study groups, reading circles, tea-parties and soirees for intellectuals in Hampstead and Chiswick and goodness knows what else. To my grumpy mind they sounded like an audience excitedly following revolutionary dramas from their own perfectly safe seats in the theatre of life.”
Setting is established only by street names and London suburbs. Roxburgh makes some attempt at Conan Doyle’s style of writing, but modern expressions slip through. The story has good potential, but it needs thorough revision. Not recommended. (D)