Kenny Shovel
Active Member
You are making an assumption that there is a past and a future and not just an here and now.
Half an hour to the seasons finale of Doctor Who and I find this out…
We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!
Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.
You are making an assumption that there is a past and a future and not just an here and now.
Not according to my time.....see aboveHalf an hour to the seasons finale of Doctor Who and I find this out…
Why can't there be more?Why can't it be enough that it's good to be alive,
True. I have the paperback, in a small pile of to read books. I did watch two long interviews with RD last year when he was doing the rounds for his hardback launch so I do have a good idea what the book is about.Well, again,you haven't read the book so I guess it's understandable that you don't know what's in it.
Much the same as Dan Brown.As was mentioned earlier, he does write about a lot of things that DO undeniably exist and can be proven. For instance, the existence of religion, the main focus of the book, is undeniable.
.............and you are measuring all this by something called time which is a measurement invented by man, much the same as a mile.Well, I know I watched Kill Bill yesterday, so there is a past. And I plan to eat some chicken in an hour or so, so there better be a future.
Madame Bovary should never have published. I haven't read the book my self but this Amazon review suggests how tedious it is:Um, sorry, why exactly are people engaging with chris302116 on this topic? Didn't we establish that (s)he's just a troll last year back on this thread? Suddenly adding the string of religious nuttiness to his/her bow surely just exacerbates this.
You can take that how you want to, but since it is one of your three favourite books you may want to disagree. This is how you defended your comments about your distaste for the James Bond novels which you had not read.Reviewer: A reader
Garden-variety romance - even more tedious than Austen or Bronte. Suitable only for teenage girls.
, which is what most of us on this forum read........it's there.exactly been troubling the literary prize juries,
to a thread that has nothing to do with God.religious nuttiness
I don't think that you understood what I was saying, possibly because I didn't present it clearly enough. Many Christians do in fact believe that they have certain proof of his existence. This can be the Bible, a 'personal encounter' with 'God', or events that they have percieved as miracles. Just because you don't see any clonclusive proof for his existence does not mean that other (more fantatical) people feel the same way.One comment was that it's not true that suicide would be in the minds of those who believe in God, again, I didn't say that, I said if the believers had 'certain proof' of God's existence, of course they don't commit suicide now because it's only a 'belief' not a 'proof'. It's their hope they're right that drives them to live on.
But many people do believe that they have certain proof. They believe that the Bible is certain proof, or that their 'personal encounter' with 'God' is certain proof, or that their witnessing of 'miracles' is certain proof.But that's what I was saying as well, it's the 'belief', either in the existence or non existence of God, that gives us the need to stay alive.
Possible extinction was only in case of 'certain proof'.
Albert EinsteinMy religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind
At the start of the book Richard Dawkins is trying to convince us the Albert Einstein did not believe in God. He does this by giving quotes Einstein made relating to God and then giving his own interpretation as to what Einstein meant. He has also cherry picked the quotes.
I understand what you are meaning but in the end it boils down to a yes or no. Is there a God.
I don't think we can know, which is why I use the term "possibility." Whatever is is, and my opinion or answer of yes or no won't change it.
Of course not, your answer won't change a thing because you would be guessing.
My answer won't change anything because my answer is not only that I don't know but that I can't know. So both yes and no are equally valid and equally meaningless. I don't know/can't know what I am saying yes to or what I am saying no to.